I Trigonometry problem for collision detection and reflection

darkdave3000
Messages
242
Reaction score
5
A particle moves from point 0 to point 2. Both positions are known. The center of the circle and it's radius is also known. I am trying to work out the position of 1 where the particle strikes the circle.

This is for a 2D astronomy simulator to work out where a particle will strike a 2D representation of Earth. I've exhausted my brain and I am hoping you guys can lend a hand. I've tried using SecTheta but its an imperfect solution, just like Tan Theta.

Purple lines and points are known magnitudes and positions and any other colors are unknowns.

The way the simulator works is it uses the Euler method to increment the position of a moving object, so the particle will move from say point 0 to point 2 between a computer cycle. The time passed typically is 0.1 seconds.

Please help. Kind Regards, David
And may the force be with u.
 

Attachments

  • problem.png
    problem.png
    20.3 KB · Views: 540
  • i126^cimgpsh_orig.png
    i126^cimgpsh_orig.png
    44.6 KB · Views: 569
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
darkdave3000 said:
A particle moves from point 0 to point 2. Both positions are known. The center of the circle and it's radius is also known. I am trying to work out the position of 1 where the particle strikes the circle.

This is for a 2D astronomy simulator to work out where a particle will strike a 2D representation of Earth. I've exhausted my brain and I am hoping you guys can lend a hand. I've tried using SecTheta but its an imperfect solution, just like Tan Theta.

Purple lines and points are known magnitudes and positions and any other colors are unknowns.

The way the simulator works is it uses the Euler method to increment the position of a moving object, so the particle will move from say point 0 to point 2 between a computer cycle. The time passed typically is 0.1 seconds.

Please help. Kind Regards, David
And may the force be with u.
How about this?
In the called-out triangle in your drawing, you know the two longer sides and the side opposite the longer one. Use the Law of Sines to get the angle at point 1. Once that angle is known, you can get the third angle (at the bottom end of your drawing), and use the Law of Cosines to get the length of the short side of your triangle.

With all angles and sides of the triangle known, you can write the coordinates of point 1 as (x, y). Point 1 is on a circle of known radius, from which you can derive an equation in x and y. Point 1 is also a known distance from Point 2, which gives you another equation in x and y. Solve these two equations simultaneously to find the coordinates of Point 1.
 
  • Like
Likes mfb
Mark44 said:
How about this?
In the called-out triangle in your drawing, you know the two longer sides and the side opposite the longer one. Use the Law of Sines to get the angle at point 1. Once that angle is known, you can get the third angle (at the bottom end of your drawing), and use the Law of Cosines to get the length of the short side of your triangle.

With all angles and sides of the triangle known, you can write the coordinates of point 1 as (x, y). Point 1 is on a circle of known radius, from which you can derive an equation in x and y. Point 1 is also a known distance from Point 2, which gives you another equation in x and y. Solve these two equations simultaneously to find the coordinates of Point 1.

Sounds solid! Ok I will do it! There is no try with the force :)
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top