Trigonometry sin and cos question

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers around deriving the expression C sin(k x) + D cos(k x) = F sin(k x + gamma) using trigonometric identities. The user initially seeks help to find values for C and D and to equate terms after expanding the right side of the equation. They later discover that their course book provides the answer, expressing regret for posting the question. A relevant trigonometric identity, sin(A+B) = sin A cos B + sin B cos A, is noted as important for the derivation. The discussion highlights the importance of consulting course materials before seeking external help.
_Andreas
Messages
141
Reaction score
1
My teacher told me that

C sin(k x) + D cos(k x) = F sin(k x+gamma)

if neither C nor D is 0 (gamma is a phase angle). How do you derive the expression on the right of the equal sign from that on the left?
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
While normally one would say C and D assume certain values, I'll let you find what those values are. Expand the expression on the right and equate the terms on both sides.
 
neutrino said:
While normally one would say C and D assume certain values, I'll let you find what those values are. Expand the expression on the right and equate the terms on both sides.

Actually, I just found out that my course book provides the answer to my question. :blushing: Sorry for bothering! But thanks anyway.

So, note to self: always look in your books before posting questions here.
 
The relevant trig identity is \sin (A+B) = \sin A \cos B + \sin B \cos A.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top