Trigonometry without sines cosines or tangents?

  • Thread starter Thread starter MaxS
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Trigonometry
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers around Dr. Norman Wildberger's approach to trigonometry, which eliminates traditional functions like sine, cosine, and tangent, proposing a new framework termed "rational trigonometry." Participants express skepticism about the novelty and superiority of this method compared to classical trigonometry, emphasizing that while Wildberger's mathematics is valid, it does not represent a fundamentally new concept. Critics highlight that classical trigonometry has been proven effective and that Wildberger's claims may misrepresent its validity. The conversation also touches on the importance of clear mathematical communication and the potential confusion caused by presenting established concepts as revolutionary. Overall, the debate reflects a mix of intrigue and skepticism regarding Wildberger's contributions to the field.
MaxS
Messages
38
Reaction score
0
Physics news on Phys.org
I want tell you that the people wo creat that page really know how important colors play their roles in web-surfers' eyes. Simple but good looking.
But I don't find it fun at all, perhaps because I am not well today.
 
lol damn =\
 
Damn it like the Hoover Dam, V shoty, V!
 
I just saw that. Here is a pdf explaining the technique:

http://web.maths.unsw.edu.au.nyud.n...rs/Chapter1.pdf
How sneeky of him to sneek in sine, cosine, tanjent and not referencing them in his concept :D
 
Last edited by a moderator:
To be fair, the mathematics is not nonsense: it's the suggestions that this is a new thing, and that it's clearly superior to classical trigonometry.
 
Once you learn the five main rules of rational trigonometry and how to simply apply them, you realize that classical trigonometry represents a misunderstanding of geometry.
What irks me most is this quote. "Classical trigonometry" has been thoroughly proven correct, and he acts like it is wrong. What he's done is not a new thing: he's just using a few changes of variables.
 
Hurkyl said:
To be fair, the mathematics is not nonsense: it's the suggestions that this is a new thing, and that it's clearly superior to classical trigonometry.
I stand corrected; I should have called it "silly" instead.
There's a big difference between a correct, but silly approach and a nonsensical approach.
 
Last edited:
  • #10
Mathematics students have cause to celebrate. A University of New South Wales academic, Dr Norman Wildberger, has rewritten the arcane rules of trigonometry and eliminated sines, cosines and tangents from the trigonometric toolkit.

I'd have thought that this idea is so bad that it could only have come from the American educational system, but lookee there I was wrong.
 
Back
Top