Trivia: Potential of the hydrogen atom

AI Thread Summary
The potential of the hydrogen atom, expressed as V=-1/r, was derived from Coulomb's Law, which describes the electrostatic force between charges. This relationship was established experimentally in the late 1700s, with significant theoretical developments occurring in the 1920s. The discussion confirms that the 1920s is a key period for understanding hydrogen's potential, although the exact year and individual responsible for this specific deduction remain unclear. The inquiry emphasizes the importance of experimental data in deriving theoretical models in physics. Overall, the hydrogen atom's potential is rooted in foundational principles of electrostatics.
jewbinson
Messages
127
Reaction score
0
When (what year and by whom?) was it discovered that the hydrogen potential is V=-1/r ? I imagine this was deduced from experimental data... amirite? Quite urgent...
From wiki it looks like it was found in teh 1920's but I'm not certain so I just want to check. Thanks in advance
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It follows from Coulomb's Law for the electrostatic force between two (point) charges, which was first established experimentally in the late 1700's.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top