Why is it that when I do integration by parts on cyclic functions such as (sinx)e^(inx), I get a trivial answer like C=C, C is a constant(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

Have I done something wrong or are there other methods of doing those integrals?

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Trivial integration by parts?

Loading...

Similar Threads - Trivial integration parts | Date |
---|---|

Non-trivial Gaussian integral | Aug 6, 2015 |

Is this supposed to be trivial?, or can it be proved? | Jun 12, 2013 |

Is this result trivial? (improper integral representations of real functions)) | Aug 10, 2012 |

Finding non trivial sum | May 18, 2012 |

Dynamics of Clifford generators (hopefully trivial) | Apr 25, 2011 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**