Trouble Understanding GRT & Space-Time Attraction

  • Thread starter Thread starter AmorLiberalitas
  • Start date Start date
AmorLiberalitas
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
How can the distortion of space-time by matter lead to the attraction of two objects in space? What I mean is on a 2D plane representing space-time, a 3D object representing a planet can cause the geometry of space-time to warp, and that a passing smaller 3D object will spiral around the larger because of the ripple it makes. However, what I do not understand is how the two-dimensional analogy can be transferred into the three-dimensional world that we inhabit. I guess what I am trying to say is how does the curvature relate to us, are we pulled down by earth, are we pushed down by warped space-time? Sorry if none of this made sense. . .
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Space-time is 4 dimensional not two dimensional: with (x,y,z and t) I think you need to see the fabric of space as 3D rather than 2D, otherwise you'll confuse yourself. It is true that GR only works if we assume a flat space in terms of acceleration and gravity, but this is not what actually happens and is one of the reasons why relativity is not compatible in certain cases with quantum mechanics.

This picture might help.

https://www.physicsforums.com/attachment.php?attachmentid=9183&stc=1&d=1171663113

Similar questions that might help.

https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=154960

https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=138373&
 

Attachments

  • Spacetime_curvature.JPG
    Spacetime_curvature.JPG
    31.8 KB · Views: 712
Last edited:
From $$0 = \delta(g^{\alpha\mu}g_{\mu\nu}) = g^{\alpha\mu} \delta g_{\mu\nu} + g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu}$$ we have $$g^{\alpha\mu} \delta g_{\mu\nu} = -g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu} \,\, . $$ Multiply both sides by ##g_{\alpha\beta}## to get $$\delta g_{\beta\nu} = -g_{\alpha\beta} g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu} \qquad(*)$$ (This is Dirac's eq. (26.9) in "GTR".) On the other hand, the variation ##\delta g^{\alpha\mu} = \bar{g}^{\alpha\mu} - g^{\alpha\mu}## should be a tensor...
OK, so this has bugged me for a while about the equivalence principle and the black hole information paradox. If black holes "evaporate" via Hawking radiation, then they cannot exist forever. So, from my external perspective, watching the person fall in, they slow down, freeze, and redshift to "nothing," but never cross the event horizon. Does the equivalence principle say my perspective is valid? If it does, is it possible that that person really never crossed the event horizon? The...
Back
Top