Trouble with mirror equations, .

  • Thread starter Thread starter x64bob
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mirror
AI Thread Summary
A dentist needs a mirror that produces a 4.5x upright image at a distance of 2.20 cm from a tooth, requiring calculations based on mirror equations. The initial calculations incorrectly used negative values for object distance, leading to an incorrect focal length and radius of curvature. The correct object distance should be positive, resulting in a focal length of -1.8 cm and a radius of curvature of -3.6 cm, indicating a concave mirror. The discussion also clarifies that negative magnification indicates an inverted image, while convex mirrors have a negative radius but do not produce inverted images. Understanding magnification is crucial, as a magnification of 2.0 means the image distance is twice the object distance.
x64bob
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
heres the problem:
a dentist wants a small mirror that, when 2.20cm from a tooth, will produce a 4.5x upright image. what kind of mirror must be used and what must its radius of curvature be?

so i did the following calculations with the mirror equations i learned:

m=4.5

equation to get the di https://www.physicsforums.com/attachment.php?attachmentid=7885&stc=1&d=1159712057

4.5*(-2.20) = di di=-9.9

1/do+1/di=1/f

1/(-2.2) + 1/(-9.9) = 1/f

1/(-2.2)=(-0.454545455)
1/(-9.9)=(-0.101010101)

(-0.454545455)+(-0.101010101)=(-0.555555556)

1/(-0.555555556)=f

1/(-0.555555556)=(-1.8)

f=(-1.8)

f2 = r

-1.8 * 2 = -3.6

so the radius is -3.6 and i guess it is concave as only concave mirrors 1.0+ magnify? that's wrong as my book says the correct answer is 5.66cm, concave. what am i doing wrong:confused:
 

Attachments

Physics news on Phys.org
x64bob said:
1/do+1/di=1/f

1/(-2.2) + 1/(-9.9) = 1/f
The object distance should be +2.2, not -2.2.
 
ok, thanks alot. so doesn't "- di/2.2" mean that both di and 2.2 are negative values?
 
x64bob said:
so doesn't "- di/2.2" mean that both di and 2.2 are negative values?
Not sure what you mean. Think of it this way. You know that do is positive: do = +2.2 cm. The magnification is positive, since the image is upright: m = +4.5. Since m = -di/do, that tells you that di is negative: di = -m*do = -9.9 cm.
 
what about convex mirrors? can i use exactly the same equations for them? on my next task (m=0.33 do=20) i had to calculate the radius for this convex mirror and i got -19.7, so if - means that the image is inverted, and as far as i know convex ones don't generate inverted images, should i remove the - or something?

and does a magnification of 2.0 mean that the di is just twice as short as do while m0.5 means that di is twice as long as do?
 
x64bob said:
what about convex mirrors? can i use exactly the same equations for them?
The basic equations are the same.
on my next task (m=0.33 do=20) i had to calculate the radius for this convex mirror and i got -19.7, so if - means that the image is inverted, and as far as i know convex ones don't generate inverted images, should i remove the - or something?
A negative magnification means that the image is inverted, but a negative radius just means that the mirror is convex.

and does a magnification of 2.0 mean that the di is just twice as short as do while m0.5 means that di is twice as long as do?
No, just the opposite. Review the definition of magnification, given by the equation: m = -di/do

So a magnification of 2.0 means that di is twice as long as do.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanged mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top