Trouble with Newton's Third Law of Motion

[Daniel Wqw]

Please forgive me for my naiveté but I've got to resolve a conceptual problem I'm having.

If every action has an equal and opposite reaction then why don't all the forces in the universe cancel each other out.

For example if i am in space and I hit a ball with force X then the ball reacts back with force X which would mean the forces cancel each other meaning there would be no resultant force and therefore no movement. I know this is nonsense but I'm just giving you an idea of the conceptual difficulty I'm having.

If anyone could resolve this I would be very appreciative. Thanks!

 

[Satvik Pandey]

Please forgive me for my naiveté but I've got to resolve a conceptual problem I'm having.

If every action has an equal and opposite reaction then why don't all the forces in the universe cancel each other out.

For example if i am in space and I hit a ball with force X then the ball reacts back with force X which would mean the forces cancel each other meaning there would be no resultant force and therefore no movement. I know this is nonsense but I'm just giving you an idea of the conceptual difficulty I'm having.

If anyone could resolve this I would be very appreciative. Thanks!

Hi Daniel.

Action and reaction forces acts on two different bodies so they never cancel out.

 

[Bandersnatch]

The two forces are not applied to the same body. When kicking a ball you act on the ball with force F and the ball acts on your foot with force -F.

 

[siddharth23]

Consider this scenario. You slap your friend. Your friend slaps you back with the same force. Equal and opposite. If they were to cancel each other out, you wouldn't feel a thing. Try it

 

[A.T.]

Consider this scenario. You slap your friend. Your friend slaps you back with the same force. Equal and opposite. If they were to cancel each other out, you wouldn't feel a thing.

Yeah, the right way to cancel forces is to have two friends slap you simultaneously from opposite sides. Report back if you felt anything.

 

[Daniel Wqw]

I'm sorry but I still really don't understand. Could somebody give a physical example please?

 

[Bandersnatch]

I'm sorry but I still really don't understand. Could somebody give a physical example please?

A block of mass M₁ is sliding on a frictionless surface with constant velocity V. It collides with a stationary block of mass M₂.
During the collision (duration t), block M₁ exerts force F₁ on block M₂. At the same time, block M₂ exerts force F₂ on block M₁. $$\vec{F_1}=-\vec{F_2}$$
As a result of the two forces, each acting on a different block during the collision, block M₁ will have lost momentum and block M₂ will have gained momentum. Total momentum is conserved.

 

[A.T.]

Could somebody give a physical example please?

Search the forum or the www for "horse cart paradox".

 

[Daniel Wqw]

Search the forum or the www for "horse cart paradox".

YES! I got it. You only resolve one objects forces, not two objects. If you resolve two objects forces the forces do cancel but if you resolve each objects forces individually then you get the right result.
Ok my fault coming from an incorrect assumption you can resolve two objects forces together when the whole principle of resolving forces rests on the fact that they're all acting on one object! At least I think this explains my error.
I actually realized this from thinking about the horse cart paradox which I found.
What everyone says actually makes sense now and I didn't see the implications of the fact the opposite forces are acting on different objects!

Thanks everyone for your help except for siddharth23's advice which, if I didn't know better, would create more problems than I'm trying to solve :)

 

[siddharth23]

Thanks everyone for your help except for siddharth23's advice which, if I didn't know better, would create more problems than I'm trying to solve :)

Haha. I wouldn't expect you to do it. Just imagine it. Anyways, as long as you got it..

 

[Andrew Mason]

If every action has an equal and opposite reaction then why don't all the forces in the universe cancel each other out.

If you consider the force on the two bodies together by looking at the acceleration of the centre of mass of the two interacting bodies, the forces do indeed result in a net zero force (on the two bodies as a whole). That leads to the principle that momentum is always conserved in any interaction. If you take the universe as a whole (which is a bit hard to define given present knowledge) the net force on the universe due to all interactions would be zero. So in that sense all the forces in the universe should sum to zero and, in that sense, cancel each other out.

AM

 

[CWatters]

example if i am in space and I hit a ball with force X then the ball reacts back with force X which would mean the forces cancel each other meaning there would be no resultant force and therefore no movement.

The forces don't cancel because they act on different objects. One acts on the ball and the other acts on you. You go in the opposite direction to the ball.

 

[psuedoben]

the way i see it is, if there wasn't an equal but opposite reaction, the ball would simply pass through the object you used to hit it with. the equal but opposite reaction means that the ball won't move relative to the object used to hit it with during the contact of the two. hope this helps a little