Trouble working out the GM product of Earth: u = GM.

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a misunderstanding regarding the calculation of Earth's gravitational parameter, μ = GM. The user initially calculated μ as 3.9884521*10^14 m^3 s^-2, which significantly deviated from the accepted value of 398,600 km^3 s^-2. The confusion arose from a unit conversion error, specifically failing to account for the cubic nature of the conversion from kilometers to meters. By recognizing that 1 km^3 equals 10^9 m^3, the user realized the correct approach would yield the accepted value after proper conversion. This highlights the importance of careful unit handling in physics calculations.
namtip
Messages
5
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Don't laugh! I am scratching my head. Somewhere I am doing something very stupid, but I just don't know where. My problem is that my result of G*M of Earth is different than the accepted result of G*M.

Accepted value of G*M: μ = 398600 km^3 s^-2



Homework Equations



μ = GM

G = 6.673*10^-11 N m^2 kg^-2

M (Earth) = 5.977*10^24 kg



The Attempt at a Solution



μ = GM = 6.673*10^-11 * 5.977*10^24 = 3.9884521*10^14

So my results show μ = 3.9884521*10^14, while the accepted results give 3.986*10^8 (after allowing for the km to m conversion)

Where have all my extra zeros come from??! I am sure this is something really stupid.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It looks like a conversion error. Wikipedia gives 398,600.44 km3s−2. To get the value in m3s−2 you need to multiply by (1000 m/km)3. I suspect you forgot the cube.
 
There are 1000 meters in a kilometer, so 10002=106 square meters in a square kilometer, 10003=109 cubic meters in a cubic kilometer.

You are dividing by 106 when you should be dividing by 109.
 
Ah, ok, so my problem here appears to lie with my grappling with the units. My answer comes out as 3.9884521*10^14 m^3 s^-2 (metres!) so, if I converted that into km^3 s^-2 I would have to divide that by 1000^3, thereby ending up with the accepted value! This would explain my confusion... schoolboy error...:rolleyes:

Thanks a lot guys!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top