Troubleshooting a System of Linear Equations

Exulus
Messages
50
Reaction score
0
I'm hoping someone can come along and give me a tap on the head for being so silly, but I've been trying this problem *all day* and i just can't seem to get a correct answer, even when checked with other people, we're all stumped! What we have:

3x - 2y + 5z = 0
x + y + 5z = 5
x - 2y - z = -4

I've then put this into an augmented matrix, and converted to reduce row echelon form which gives me these equations:

x + z = 2
y + z = 3

So I try a general solution set as (t, 1+t, 2-t) however it doesn't seem to work with the equations at the beginning. so i looked at what i'd written and went back a step before row echelon form which has these equations:

x + y + 5z = 5
y + z = 3

Giving a solution set of (4t-10, t, 3-t) but still this doesn't seem to be consistent. Any ideas where I am going wrong? Thanks :)
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
You made a mistake reducing your matrix.

You should get x = 0 , y = 5/3 z = 2/3.
 
Hmm, are you sure? Because the question asks for the "general solutions" rather than any specific one. According to the way i reduced my matrix, there are infinitely many solutions. I'll have a go at typing out what I've done:

\left(\begin{array}{ccc|c}3&-2&5&0\\1&1&5&5\\1&-2&-1&-4\end{array}\right)

R1 <-> R2

\left(\begin{array}{ l c c | r } 1 &amp; 1 &amp; 5 &amp; 5 \\ 3 &amp; -2 &amp; 5 &amp; 0 \\ 1 &amp; -2 &amp; -1 &amp; -4 \end{array}\right)

R2 -> R2 - 3R1
R3 -> R3 - R1

\left(\begin{array}{ccc|c}1&amp;1&amp;5&amp;5\\0&amp;-5&amp;-10&amp;-15\\0&amp;-3&amp;-6&amp;-9\end{array}\right)

R2 -> -1/5 x R2
R3 -> -1/3 x R3

\left(\begin{array}{ccc|c}1&amp;1&amp;5&amp;5\\0&amp;1&amp;2&amp;3\\0&amp;1&amp;2&amp;3\end{array}\right)

R3 -> R3 - R2
R1 -> R1 - R2

\left(\begin{array}{ccc|c}1&amp;0&amp;3&amp;2\\0&amp;1&amp;2&amp;3\\0&amp;0&amp;0&amp;0\end{array}\right)

Sorry for the dodgy formatting..it doesn't seem to like me..hope that made sense though? If anyone knows how to stop it cutting off the top of the numbers then that would be great :)
 
Last edited:
Well there's your problem. In your original post you dropped the coefficients for z.
So you have x+3z =2, y+2z=3, z=t. So x=2-3t, y=3-2t, z=t.
 
I can't believe i didnt see that :smile: I knew i must've done something silly! Thanks for pointing that stupid mistake out...i think i'll go crawl in a hole now :biggrin:
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.

Similar threads

Back
Top