Troubleshooting Algebraic Anomaly: Why x = -1 Doesn't Work? | Basic Algebra Tips

  • Thread starter Thread starter terryds
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Anomaly
AI Thread Summary
The equation x - √((x+2)²) = 0 leads to the solution x = -1 through algebraic manipulation, but this value does not satisfy the original equation. The issue arises from squaring both sides, which can introduce extraneous solutions that do not hold true in the context of the original equation. It is essential to verify any solutions obtained from such operations by substituting them back into the original equation. Ultimately, the discussion concludes that the original equation has no valid solutions, as confirmed by checking the derived solutions against the equation's constraints.
terryds
Messages
392
Reaction score
13

Homework Statement



I want to find x that satisfies ##x-\sqrt{(x+2)^2} = 0##
Using algebric method, I find x = -1
But, x = -1 does not satisfy that equation...
What's wrong with the calculation?

Homework Equations


(Basic algebra)

The Attempt at a Solution



##x-\sqrt{(x+2)^2} = 0 \\
x = sqrt{(x+2)^2} ##
By squaring both sides , I\ get
##x^2 = (x+2)^2 \\
x^2 = x^2 + 4x + 4 \\
0 = 4x + 4 \\
x = -1 \\
##

What's wrong with this ?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
The equation you want to solve does not have a solution to begin with.
 
blue_leaf77 said:
The equation you want to solve does not have a solution to begin with.

So, does it mean that it's necessary to plug the solution that I get from algebric calculation into the equation to confirm it's true??
 
terryds said:

Homework Statement



I want to find x that satisfies ##x-\sqrt{(x+2)^2} = 0##
Using algebric method, I find x = -1
But, x = -1 does not satisfy that equation...
What's wrong with the calculation?

Homework Equations


(Basic algebra)

The Attempt at a Solution



##x-\sqrt{(x+2)^2} = 0 \\
x = sqrt{(x+2)^2} ##
By squaring both sides , I\ get
##x^2 = (x+2)^2 \\
x^2 = x^2 + 4x + 4 \\
0 = 4x + 4 \\
x = -1 \\
##

What's wrong with this ?
When you square both sides of an equation, there's the possibility that you'll get an equation whose solutions are not the same as the original equation. In this case, squaring introduced an extraneous solution.
 
terryds said:
So, does it mean that it's necessary to plug the solution that I get from algebric calculation into the equation to confirm it's true??
Yes
 
  • Like
Likes terryds
Mark44 said:
When you square both sides of an equation, there's the possibility that you'll get an equation whose solutions are not the same as the original equation. In this case, squaring introduced an extraneous solution.

Hmmm..
So squaring both sides is a wrong attempt to find the solution ?
I wonder if there are any article about to-dos and not-to-dos in solving particular algebraic equations...
 
terryds said:
Hmmm..
So squaring both sides is a wrong attempt to find the solution ?
No, this is the right approach. It's just that when you apply any non-reversible operation (such as squaring, raising to fourth power, etc.), you need to check to see if you have introduced extraneous solutions.
terryds said:
I wonder if there are any article about to-dos and not-to-dos in solving particular algebraic equations...
You might try doing a search for "extraneous solutions". Most algebra textbooks mention this in the section where equations involving radicals are presented.
 
  • Like
Likes terryds
For this equation, you can actually still work in a way which does not introduce any extra solution. Note that you can cast the original equation into ##x-|x+2|=0##. Solve this equation for ##x<-2## and ##x>-2## to see if there is a solution in each region.
 
Mark44 said:
No, this is the right approach. It's just that when you apply any non-reversible operation (such as squaring, raising to fourth power, etc.), you need to check to see if you have introduced extraneous solutions.

You might try doing a search for "extraneous solutions". Most algebra textbooks mention this in the section where equations involving radicals are presented.

Thanks a lot!

blue_leaf77 said:
For this equation, you can actually still work in a way which does not introduce any extra solution. Note that you can cast the original equation into ##x-|x+2|=0##. Solve this equation for ##x<-2## and ##x>-2## to see if there is a solution in each region.

x-x+2 = 0 (No solution)
x+x+2=0
2x+2=0
x=-1 (Still an extraneous solution)
 
  • #10
terryds said:
x-x+2 = 0
x-x-2=0
terryds said:
x+x+2=0
2x+2=0
x=-1 (Still an extraneous solution)
You forget that you are looking for a solution in ##x<-2##. The solution you find there lies outside this range.
 
  • #11
blue_leaf77 said:
x-x-2=0

You forget that you are looking for a solution in ##x<-2##. The solution you find there lies outside this range.

So it means no solutions, right ?
 
  • #12
Yes.
 
  • #13
terryds said:

Homework Statement



I want to find x that satisfies ##x-\sqrt{(x+2)^2\,} = 0##
Using algebraic method, I find x = -1
But, x = -1 does not satisfy that equation...
What's wrong with the calculation?
Suppose you were to solve ##\ x+\sqrt{(x+2)^2\,} = 0\ ## and you used the same method.

That is equivalent to ##\ \sqrt{(x+2)^2\,} = -x\ .##

Squaring both sides gives ##\ (x+2)^2 = x^2\ ##, the same as in your case, giving ##\ x=-1\ .## Here the solution is valid.
 
Back
Top