Troubleshooting First Order ODE Conversions

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the conversion of a second-order ordinary differential equation (ODE) into a system of first-order ODEs. The original poster presents a specific equation, seeking assistance with the conversion process and the proper setup of new variables.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the appropriate introduction of new variables and the necessity of expressing the ODE in terms of these variables. There are questions about the correct formulation of the problem and the interpretation of the task at hand.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided guidance on the correct approach to converting the ODE, emphasizing the need to avoid introducing unnecessary variables and to follow the conventions of expressing the equations. There is recognition of the commonality of the problem, with suggestions to refer to textbooks for foundational understanding.

Contextual Notes

There is an indication that the original poster may have misunderstood the nature of the conversion process, as well as the expectations for the assignment. The discussion highlights the importance of grasping the underlying concepts rather than merely following procedural steps.

LSMOG
Messages
62
Reaction score
0
Moved from a technical forum, so homework template missing
What am I doing wrong here in my attachment?
 

Attachments

  • 15270592973801975924065.jpg
    15270592973801975924065.jpg
    12.6 KB · Views: 474
Physics news on Phys.org
I'll be nice and write it out for you, but this is something that you should have done yourself instead of posting a picture:
$$
2 y'' -5 y' + y = 0
$$
You then set ##x_1 = y##, ##x_2 = y'## and ##x_3 = y''##.

First off, that ##x_3## shouldn't be there. You only introduce new variables up to one order less than the ODE.

Second, when you start writing the new set of ODEs, you must write everything in terms of the new variables, so there shouldn't be any ##y##'s left.
 
Thanks a lot, thanks again
 
You are not doing something wrong because you're not really doing anything!
I don't know what other helpers think, but every now and then we get here question on a very standard problem the answer or solution method to which is the first chapter, or the first page of a chapter in any textbook on the subject. Helpers are not here to re-write the textbooks but to help out with difficulties or confusions in understanding points or difficulties students run into trying to apply the methods.

I assume you can actually solve this equation? That will be a useful check and background. The question is asking you to solve it in a particular way. It Ii almost telling you the way when it says ' convert to first-order o.d.e.'. A first order (homogeneous linear with constant coefficients) ode is something of the form
(aD + B)f(y) = 0 where D stands for d/dx and you have to find a, b, f . f(y) = 0 is another first-order ode.
Doing this is called "factorisation of the operator". You will find it in plenty of books and online sources. If you consider first some elementary examples (your example is not quite the easiest) you will begin to see this as a natural thing to do, not something taken out of a hat. If you apply the "operator" (aD + b) to a first order differential equation, you will get a second order differential equation.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Mark44
epenguin said:
The question is asking you to solve it in a particular way. It Ii almost telling you the way when it says ' convert to first-order o.d.e.'.
The thread title betrays some misunderstanding: "Convert to a first order ODE".
You can't convert a second-order ODE to a first-order ODE, but you can convert a second-order ODE into a system of two first-order differential equations.

epenguin said:
Helpers are not here to re-write the textbooks but to help out with difficulties or confusions in understanding points or difficulties students run into trying to apply the methods.
I agree. Your first resource should be your textbook, which almost certainly has an example of a problem like this.
 
Thanks and I am sorry colleagues
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
4K
Replies
9
Views
2K