Troubleshooting My Inverse Trig Proof

AI Thread Summary
The proof attempts to show that cos^{-1}x - π/2 equals π - cos^{-1}√(1-x^2), leading to the incorrect conclusion that cos^{-1}x + cos^{-1}√(1-x^2) = 3π/2 for all x. The error arises in the application of the cosine subtraction identity, where the correct form should include a plus sign instead of a minus sign. This mistake results in a false statement, valid only for x = -1. To troubleshoot similar issues in the future, testing specific values like x = 1/2 can help identify errors in trigonometric identities. Accurate application of identities is crucial in proving relationships involving inverse trigonometric functions.
Mentallic
Homework Helper
Messages
3,802
Reaction score
95
What is wrong with my proof?

Let \theta=cos^{-1}x-\frac{\pi}{2}

Then cos\theta=cos\left(cos^{-1}x-\frac{\pi}{2}\right)

RHS=xcos\frac{\pi}{2}-sin(cos^{-1}x)sin\frac{\pi}{2}

=-\sqrt{1-x^2}

Therefore \theta=cos^{-1}(-\sqrt{1-x^2})

\theta=\pi-cos^{-1}\sqrt{1-x^2}

Hence cos^{-1}x-\frac{\pi}{2}=\pi-cos^{-1}\sqrt{1-x^2}

So finally, cos^{-1}x+cos^{-1}\sqrt{1-x^2}=\frac{3\pi}{2}

Except this is untrue for all values except x=-1. I'm guessing I probably made a substitution which is valid for only certain values. Inverse trig seems to do that a lot to me :cry:
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Mentallic said:
Let \theta=cos^{-1}x-\frac{\pi}{2}

Then cos\theta=cos\left(cos^{-1}x-\frac{\pi}{2}\right)

RHS=xcos\frac{\pi}{2}-sin(cos^{-1}x)sin\frac{\pi}{2}

The last line here is wrong. The appropriate identity states:
\cos(\alpha-\beta) = \cos\alpha\,\cos\beta + \sin \alpha\,\sin\beta
So you should have gotten:
RHS=xcos\frac{\pi}{2}+sin(cos^{-1}x)sin\frac{\pi}{2}
In the future a good way to identify an error in an argument about trigonometric identities is to simply plug in a number. Preferably one whose value you can calculate under the functions you are working with and which doesn't have very nice symmetric properties since that is usually where errors creep in. For instance in your case I would have tested with x=1/2 which would have yielded:
\theta = \cos^{-1}1/2 - \pi/2 = -\pi/6
\cos\theta = \sqrt{3}\pi/2
(1/2)\cos\pi/2 - \sin(\cos^{-1}(1/2))\sin\pi/2 = - \sin(\pi/3) = -\sqrt{3}\pi/2
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Back
Top