Troubleshooting Newton-Raphson Iteration for Log-Likelihood Problem

  • Thread starter Thread starter Kinetica
  • Start date Start date
Kinetica
Messages
83
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Hi guys!
I have solved a log-likelihood problem and its Newton-Raphson Iteration. My step-by-step solution is attached.

The only problem I have is when I plug in numbers, the final number for the first order Newton-Raphson is different from my professor's.

I guess you don't need any numbers. If you can can detect a mistake in my formula derivation, I will really appreciate it.
 

Attachments

  • Newton-Raphson.png
    Newton-Raphson.png
    7.9 KB · Views: 438
Physics news on Phys.org
Just to clarify, the t index variable of the summations is distinct from \tau, right? What depends on t? What happened to the term

\sum_{t=1}^n \log x!

?
 
Yep! It's different.
I am taking derivative with respect to that t-look-alike.
So I guess you treat x as a number.
But I cannot guarantee it.
Correct me if I am wrong please.

vela said:
Just to clarify, the t index variable of the summations is distinct from \tau, right? What depends on t? What happened to the term

\sum_{t=1}^n \log x!

?
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top