True, false questions about matrices

  • Thread starter Thread starter lukaszh
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Matrices
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around true or false questions regarding matrices, specifically focusing on properties of Hermitian and diagonalizable matrices. The first question addresses whether Hermitian matrix A implies that matrices B and C are anti-symmetric, concluding that this statement is false since B is symmetric and C is anti-symmetric. The second question discusses diagonalizable matrices and claims that if a matrix is diagonalizable, it must have n different eigenvalues, which is confirmed as true. However, a participant challenges this assertion by pointing out that diagonalizable matrices can have repeated eigenvalues, emphasizing that diagonalizability is tied to having n independent eigenvectors, not distinct eigenvalues. The conversation highlights the nuances of matrix properties and their implications in linear algebra.
lukaszh
Messages
32
Reaction score
0
Hello,
could you help me with some true false questions about matrices?

First
If \mathbf{A}=\mathbf{B}-\mathrm{i}\mathbf{C} is hermitian matrix \mathbf{B},\mathbf{C} are real, then \mathbf{B},\mathbf{C} are anti-symmetric matrices. True? False?

My solution
If \mathbf{A} is hermitian, then \mathbf{A}^{\mathrm{H}}=\mathbf{A} so (\mathbf{B}-\mathrm{i}\mathbf{C})^{\mathrm{H}}=\mathbf{B}^{\mathrm{H}}-(\mathrm{i}\mathbf{C})^{\mathrm{H}}=\mathbf{B}^{\mathrm{T}}+i\mathbf{C}^{\mathrm{T}}. It implies the fact \mathbf{B}^{\mathrm{T}}+i\mathbf{C}^{\mathrm{T}}=\mathbf{B}-\mathrm{i}\mathbf{C}. \mathbf{B} is symmetric and \mathbf{C} is anti-symmetric. FALSE

Second
If A is diagonalizable and its eigenvalues are \{\lambda_1,\lambda_2,\cdots,\lambda_n\}, then \prod_{k=1}^{n}(x-\lambda_k)=0 has n different solutions

My solution
Matrix is diagonalizable, then \lambda_i\ne\lambda_j for i\ne j. So polynomial has n different soln's. TRUE


Thank you very much for your help...
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
You have a much bigger problem that whether this statement is true of false! What makes you think that if a matrix is diagonalizable, then \lambda_i\ne\lambda_j?

The identity matrix is diagonalizable because it is diagonal. What are its eigenvalues?

(An n by n matrix is diagonalizable if and only if it has n independent eigenvectors. It doesn't matter what the eigenvalues are.)
 
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top