True map of universe from computer simulation with CMB initial state

AI Thread Summary
Creating a simplified computer simulation of the universe using the cosmic microwave background (CMB) as an initial state faces significant challenges. The randomness of the universe makes it difficult to predict the exact locations of galaxy clusters, as the fluctuations in the CMB may not directly correspond to observable matter. Additionally, the CMB serves as a 2D surface rather than a 3D space, limiting its utility as a starting point for simulations. Even if computational hurdles are overcome, the lack of detailed initial data prevents the generation of an accurate map of our region in the universe. Ultimately, while simulations can mimic the CMB's statistical properties, they cannot reliably recreate the true structure of galaxies or clusters.
divitWasHere
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Do you think we will ever be able to create a simplified computer simulation of the universe using the cosmic microwave background as the initial state that would generate the true locations of galaxies or at least galaxy clusters, and then be able to find our own galaxy or galaxy cluster within this simulation?

I assume the model would have to make a great number of simplications while still preserving the true location of formed galaxies.

What are the biggest bottlenecks?
1. computation complexity?
2. not enough detail in the cosmic microwave background map?
3. finding our own galaxy once the simulation runs?

~David
 
Space news on Phys.org
Hi David, welcome here. Well my view is that the Universe is too random to repeatedly predict any relatively tiny event like a Galaxy cluster. Also I am not sure if the fluctuations we can see in the CMBR can be proven to correspond to matter we can still see forming part of any galaxy clusters. Let's see what the experts say about this.
 
Last edited:
4. The light of the plasma that eventually became our galaxy now being part of the CMB of observers 42 billion light years away, having passed our progenitor atoms some 13.8 billion years ago.
IOW: you cannot see your own past, you always see light from somewhere else. There are no mirrors in the universe.

The CMB we see now has nothing to do with galaxy formation at our position. Simulations use only its statistical properties to derive their starting conditions, not its actual shape. It would not be sufficient as starting condition for a 3D simulation anyway, as it is a 2D surface, not a 3D space.
 
Thanks Ich. So from what I understand, even if we were able to overcome the computational burden, we do not have enough information for the initail state to generate a true map of our region. Our initial state cannot be implied from any other data that we currently have.
 
Right.

What we see is an enormous uniformity in the CMB, even though it started from totally different regions of the universe. So it is a reasonable assumption that the universe of our past also looked somewhat similar. The simulation use random starting conditions with the constraing that they'd give rise to a similar looking CMB. If everything works correctly, you get a random universe that looks somewhat similar to our own.
 
Abstract The Event Horizon Telescope (EHT) has significantly advanced our ability to study black holes, achieving unprecedented spatial resolution and revealing horizon-scale structures. Notably, these observations feature a distinctive dark shadow—primarily arising from faint jet emissions—surrounded by a bright photon ring. Anticipated upgrades of the EHT promise substantial improvements in dynamic range, enabling deeper exploration of low-background regions, particularly the inner shadow...
Back
Top