Truss Bridges: Strength Explained

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter JimmyRay
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Structure
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion focuses on the strength of truss bridges, particularly the role of triangular shapes in their structural integrity. Participants explore the physics behind why triangles are effective in supporting loads and preventing deformation compared to other shapes, such as rectangles or polygons with more than three sides.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions the physics behind the strength of truss bridges and seeks clarification on the role of triangles.
  • Another participant suggests that the strength comes from each member being supported by two other members, with stresses opposing each other.
  • A different viewpoint emphasizes that triangular forms provide strength because they resist deformation; unlike rectangles, which can change angles without altering side lengths, triangles maintain their shape under stress.
  • One participant challenges the idea that other polygons with an odd number of sides can provide similar strength, asserting that only triangles should be considered for this purpose.
  • Another participant counters this by demonstrating that pentagons can be easily distorted without changing side lengths, suggesting that not all polygons are effective in the same way as triangles.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the effectiveness of shapes beyond triangles in providing structural strength, indicating a lack of consensus on this aspect of truss bridge design.

Contextual Notes

Some claims about the properties of shapes and their structural implications remain unresolved, particularly regarding the strength of polygons with more than three sides.

JimmyRay
Messages
89
Reaction score
0
What makes truss bridges so strong? Like if you have something supported by triangles, why is it good? I don't really understand the physics behind it.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
you must look at the entire structure itself to understand. each member is supported by teo other members whose stress is oppisite the one being supported
 
A truss bridge gains it's strength from the numerous triangular forms contained in it's structure. Were the structural members of the span arranged in rectangles instead of triangles, the bridge would be weak and collapse. This is because in a rectangle, a lateral force can change the angles without changing the lengths of any of the sides (the beams), allowing the rectangle to collapse without any compressive or tension forces to resist the collapse.

But in a triangular object (or I think any other polygon with an odd number of sides - isn't that right?) you cannot change the angles without changing the lengths of the sides. So the beams push back on any force that tries to change their shape. Since the triangle has the least number of angles of any odd sided figure, even a small change in angle would require a large change in side length, resulting in a large resistive force.
 
Bob3141592 said:
But in a triangular object (or I think any other polygon with an odd number of sides - isn't that right?)
Nope. Stick with triangles.

Build a pentagon from straws. You can easily distort its angles without any change in the length of its sides.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
6K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K