Understanding Truss Mechanics: Why Use the Ratio 40/41 and Y Distance of 6.3?

  • Thread starter Thread starter garr6120
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mechanics Truss
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on understanding the use of the ratio 40/41 and a y distance of 6.3 ft in calculating the force for member AB in a truss system. Participants clarify that the ratio arises from the Pythagorean Theorem, where the length of AD is determined to be 41 ft, making the tangent of the angle 40/41. A participant shares their calculation for the force, which differs from the expected answer, prompting questions about the moment arm and the correct approach to finding distances. The importance of using the perpendicular distance to point G for moment calculations is emphasized, along with the need for clarity on how to derive the moment arm accurately. Overall, the conversation highlights the complexities of truss mechanics and the significance of precise calculations in structural analysis.
garr6120
Messages
42
Reaction score
0
Given the diagram in the file. I am trying to find the force for the member AB and I do not understand why they use the ratio 40/41 and why they are using 6.3 as the y distance because we have 9ft given and we use the ratio 4/5 instead of 40/41.
 

Attachments

  • Screen Shot 2016-12-03 at 5.11.47 PM.png
    Screen Shot 2016-12-03 at 5.11.47 PM.png
    50.7 KB · Views: 821
Engineering news on Phys.org
garr6120 said:
Given the diagram in the file. I am trying to find the force for the member AB and I do not understand why they use the ratio 40/41 and why they are using 6.3 as the y distance because we have 9ft given and we use the ratio 4/5 instead of 40/41.
You haven't shown any of the calculations, but it's immediately clear that the length of AD must by 41 ft because of the Pythagorean Theorem. Therefore, the tangent of the angle is 40/41. Presumably this is relevant.
 
Mapes said:
You haven't shown any of the calculations, but it's immediately clear that the length of AD must by 41 ft because of the Pythagorean Theorem. Therefore, the tangent of the angle is 40/41. Presumably this is relevant.

Sorry I should of shown them my bad. I calculated: the sum of moments around G. which is equal to -1.8kips(14ft)-0.9kips(28ft+(9/15(Fab))(9ft)
solving for the Fab I get a force of 9.33kN however the answer is 8.20kN and they use a ratio of 40/41 times 6.3 ft. I was wondering how to approach this problem and what am I doing wrong. Isn't the moment of Fab 9ft above G?
 
garr6120 said:
Sorry I should of shown them my bad. I calculated: the sum of moments around G. which is equal to -1.8kips(14ft)-0.9kips(28ft+(9/15(Fab))(9ft)
solving for the Fab I get a force of 9.33kN however the answer is 8.20kN and they use a ratio of 40/41 times 6.3 ft. I was wondering how to approach this problem and what am I doing wrong. Isn't the moment of Fab 9ft above G?
Ah, got it. Good identification of the correct free-body diagram to use! But the moment arm of AB is the perpendicular distance to G. The way I'd calculate it is to say that the cosine of the far right angle is d / 28 ft (where d is the moment arm) and that the cosine is also 9 ft / 41 ft from the larger triangle. (Note that the first hypotenuse is on the bottom; the second is on the top.) This gives the same answer. There are probably a few ways to work it out; it would be good practice to try to find another way.

EDIT: Sorry, earlier I should have written that the sine, not the tangent, is 40/41.
 
I have a question though I understand that AB is the perpendicular distance above G therefore you cannot find a moment using the length of AB in the x direction. However, I am still confused about the length in x being 40 from G shouldn't the length be 12ft. Am I thinking about Moments wrong?
 
I'm not sure what you mean when you say "the length in x being 40 from G". You may be referring to a calculation that I don't see. The moment arm of AB around point G is shown below. There are multiple ways to find this distance; the approach I took was to first find angle CDH, whose tangent is 9 ft / 40 ft. Then I used the fact that the sine of the angle is d / 28 ft, where d is the perpendicular distance from AB to G.
upload_2016-12-4_9-32-25.png
 
How did you find PF?: Via Google search Hi, I have a vessel I 3D printed to investigate single bubble rise. The vessel has a 4 mm gap separated by acrylic panels. This is essentially my viewing chamber where I can record the bubble motion. The vessel is open to atmosphere. The bubble generation mechanism is composed of a syringe pump and glass capillary tube (Internal Diameter of 0.45 mm). I connect a 1/4” air line hose from the syringe to the capillary The bubble is formed at the tip...
Thread 'Physics of Stretch: What pressure does a band apply on a cylinder?'
Scenario 1 (figure 1) A continuous loop of elastic material is stretched around two metal bars. The top bar is attached to a load cell that reads force. The lower bar can be moved downwards to stretch the elastic material. The lower bar is moved downwards until the two bars are 1190mm apart, stretching the elastic material. The bars are 5mm thick, so the total internal loop length is 1200mm (1190mm + 5mm + 5mm). At this level of stretch, the load cell reads 45N tensile force. Key numbers...
I'd like to create a thread with links to 3-D Printer resources, including printers and software package suggestions. My motivations are selfish, as I have a 3-D printed project that I'm working on, and I'd like to buy a simple printer and use low cost software to make the first prototype. There are some previous threads about 3-D printing like this: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/are-3d-printers-easy-to-use-yet.917489/ but none that address the overall topic (unless I've missed...
Back
Top