I Trying to get a physical understanding of a Fermi gas

AI Thread Summary
A physical understanding of conduction electrons in a Fermi gas involves recognizing that ionized valence electrons in metals are not bound to individual atoms but are delocalized across the metallic lattice. The first ionization energy pertains to isolated atoms, while in a solid, overlapping valence states facilitate electron conduction. The concept of electrons occupying quantum states within a potential well is simplified; in reality, conduction electrons exist in a collective "box" representing the solid. The Fermi level indicates the energy of the highest occupied state at absolute zero, and Pauli exclusion applies as electrons fill available states. Overall, understanding these principles clarifies the behavior of conduction electrons in metals.
MarkL
Messages
34
Reaction score
2
TL;DR Summary
trying to get a physical understanding of fermi gas
I would like to get a more physical interpretation of conduction electrons (fermi gas) in a metal. I imagine ionized valence electrons close to the ions, with the fermi level (highest energy electrons) of the gas participating in conduction. A point of confusion for me...the first ionization energy for most metals are always higher than the fermi level, i.e. wouldn't the electron want to combine with the ions rather than conduct?

Also, I have some confusion with quantum states. Textbooks usually demonstrate this with ##λ_n##'s in a potential well. To understand the actual position of electrons (fermions), I give the well zero potential. This is just a box. At low density this is a classical gas. At higher densities, where the space between electrons is less than DeBroglie wavelength, this would be quantum. By Pauli exclusion, one electron (λ) per well. So, N electrons in N identical states (wells) and identical fermi energies. Is this correct?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
MarkL said:
A point of confusion for me...the first ionization energy for most metals are always higher than the fermi level, i.e. wouldn't the electron want to combine with the ions rather than conduct?

If I'm not mistaken, the first ionization energy is only for single atoms, not atoms that are bound into the metallic lattice of a bulk material. When bound, the valence states overlap and allow for the delocalization of the electrons occupying those states. So the valence electrons are not bound to a single atom, despite not being ionized.
 
MarkL said:
Summary:: trying to get a physical understanding of fermi gas

So, N electrons in N identical states (wells) and identical fermi energies. Is this correct?
If I understand you, this is very wrong. The electrons (particularly conduction electrons) are all in one "box" which is the chunk of solid matter. The different states are quantized because the wavelength must match the box boundary conditions and Fermi exclusion prevails. The Fermi level is where you are in wavenumber when you put in the final electron. This is basic solid state theory a la Ashcroft and Mermin.
 
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...
Back
Top