Trying to understand time delineation

  • Thread starter Thread starter Vivaci
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Time
Vivaci
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hi, it is my first time posting on this forum, and you have no doubt seen similar questions.

I am just an average person trying to understand the concept of time dilation. So I've read through the theory, but my mind goes all fuzzy when I get to this part.
So I know I'm missing something major, and I might be comparing apples with pears.

I made this graphical representation (of my thoughts) to try and reason it out. Still no success. Could someone explain in layman's terms, with reference to my pics?

[PLAIN]http://img718.imageshack.us/img718/8779/timedelineation.jpg
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Vivaci, welcome to PF,

I can't really follow your diagrams. Perhaps you can work in a traditional 1,1 spacetime diagram which is drawn with the time axis vertical and one spatial dimension horizontal with the other two spatial dimensions suppressed to make it easier to draw.

As far as an easy explanation, I actually prefer to start from the spacetime interval. There is a quantity called the spacetime interval which is the same in all reference frames. It can be written:

ds²=-c²dt²+dx²+dy²+dz²

All of the relativistic effects can be derived from this one formula.
 
Welcome to PF, Vivaci!

I think I understand your first two lines of diagrams. Nothing wrong with them except the "when you will see the object..." part, this point is obviously to the right of "You" in the first diagram.
However, they have nothing to do with time dilation, the're only concerning the classical doppler effect.
Time dilation is what is left after you correct for light travel times. You have to draw http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Time_d...ce_of_time_dilation_due_to_relative_velocity" to derive it, and you have to use the assumption that the speed of light is the same in all diagrams.

For your other diagrams: you don't need 3D graphs for this "experiment". Try to plot the relevant events and worldlines in a simple 2D time/distance diagram. You'll need http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spacetime_diagram" anyway if you want to learn relativity.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Perhaps it is my account but I do not see any diagrams.
Oh, never mind, I found out why, here in China not everything is accessible and imageshack is one of the blocked sites.
 
OK, so this has bugged me for a while about the equivalence principle and the black hole information paradox. If black holes "evaporate" via Hawking radiation, then they cannot exist forever. So, from my external perspective, watching the person fall in, they slow down, freeze, and redshift to "nothing," but never cross the event horizon. Does the equivalence principle say my perspective is valid? If it does, is it possible that that person really never crossed the event horizon? The...
In this video I can see a person walking around lines of curvature on a sphere with an arrow strapped to his waist. His task is to keep the arrow pointed in the same direction How does he do this ? Does he use a reference point like the stars? (that only move very slowly) If that is how he keeps the arrow pointing in the same direction, is that equivalent to saying that he orients the arrow wrt the 3d space that the sphere is embedded in? So ,although one refers to intrinsic curvature...
So, to calculate a proper time of a worldline in SR using an inertial frame is quite easy. But I struggled a bit using a "rotating frame metric" and now I'm not sure whether I'll do it right. Couls someone point me in the right direction? "What have you tried?" Well, trying to help truly absolute layppl with some variation of a "Circular Twin Paradox" not using an inertial frame of reference for whatevere reason. I thought it would be a bit of a challenge so I made a derivation or...
Back
Top