A Tsirelson bound and mixed states.

jk22
Messages
732
Reaction score
25
Could it be possible that using a mixed stated ##\rho=\sum_{i=1}^4|\langle e_i|\Psi\rangle|^2|e_i\rangle\langle e_i|##

Where ##\Psi## is the singlet state and the ##e_i## form an orthonormal basis (like an intermediary state),That one could violate Tsirelson's bound if the parameters describing the basis could depend on the angle of measurements ? (The latter would imply that this intermediary state basis would be at the recollecting of both side's datas)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Violating Tsirelson's bound permits unobserved levels of information transfer. Specifically if you had Alice and Bob each with one particle from an entangled pair it would allow Bob to learn the value of ##m## bits from a dataset of Alice's by her transmitting ##n < m## bits.

Also it would imply that observables that are pairwise joint measurable are not totally joint measurable, e.g. ##\{A,B\}##, ##\{B,C\}## and ##\{A,C\}## are all joint measurable but ##\{A,B,C\}## is not. This contradicts QM and isn't observed in practice.
 
  • Like
Likes atyy
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top