Tube lemma generalization proof

  • Thread starter Thread starter radou
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Proof Tube
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on proving the existence of open sets U in X and V in Y such that A x B is contained within U x V, which is also contained within an open set N in X x Y. The proof utilizes the compactness of A and B to derive a finite subcover from the open cover of A x B. The participant attempts to establish a relationship between the finite subcover and the original open set N, ultimately proposing U and V as unions of intersections of basis elements. The correctness of this approach is questioned, indicating a need for validation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of compact spaces in topology
  • Familiarity with open sets and basis elements in product topology
  • Knowledge of finite subcover properties in compactness
  • Proficiency in manipulating unions and intersections of sets
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the concept of compactness in topology, specifically in relation to product spaces
  • Learn about the construction of open covers and finite subcovers
  • Explore the properties of basis elements in topological spaces
  • Investigate the implications of intersections and unions in set theory
USEFUL FOR

Mathematics students, particularly those studying topology, as well as educators and researchers interested in the properties of compact spaces and their applications in proofs.

radou
Homework Helper
Messages
3,149
Reaction score
8

Homework Statement



Let A and B be compact subspaces of X and Y, respectively. Let N be an open set in X x Y containing A x B. One needs to show that there exist open sets U in X and V in Y such that A x B \subseteq U x V \subseteq N.

The Attempt at a Solution



Here's my try:

First of all, since N is open, it can be written as a union of basis elements in X x Y, i.e. let N = \cup U_{i} \times V_{i}.

Then we cover A x B with basis elements contained in N, so that A \times B \subseteq \cup U_{i}' \times V_{i}'. Since A and B are compact, so is A x B, and for this cover, we have a finite subcover, so that A \times B \subseteq \cup_{i=1}^n U_{i}' \times V_{i}'.

Now we have the following relation:

A \times B \subseteq \cup_{i=1}^n U_{i}' \times V_{i}' \subseteq \cup U_{i} \times V_{i} = N.

Now, I'm not sure if this relation holds:

\cup_{i=1}^n (U_{i}' \times V_{i}') \cap (\cup U_{i} \times V_{i}) \subseteq \cup_{i=1}^n (U_{i}' \cap (\cup U_{i})) \times \cup_{i=1}^n (V_{i}' \cap (\cup V_{i})) \subseteq N. If it does, then U = \cup_{i=1}^n (U_{i}' \cap (\cup U_{i})) and V = \cup_{i=1}^n (V_{i}' \cap (\cup V_{i})) are the sets we were looking for.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
If x = (a, b) is in (\cup_{i=1}^n (U_{i}' \times V_{i}')) \cap (\cup U_{i} \times V_{i}) then a is in Ui, b is in Vi, for some i, and a is in Ui' and b is in Vi'. So, a is in the intersection of Ui and Ui', for some i, and b is in the intersection of Vi and Vi', for some i, i.e. in their unions, so a is in (\cup_{i=1}^n (U_{i}' \cap (\cup U_{i}))) \times (\cup_{i=1}^n (V_{i}' \cap (\cup V_{i}))).

Any comments?

Edit: just corrected some LaTeX errors and added some brackets, now it should be OK.
 
Last edited:
Still no ideas? I'd like to know if this is correct, so I can finalize the exercise section I'm working on.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K