Tuning Fork - Simple Harmonic Motion

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the mathematical aspects of simple harmonic motion, specifically regarding a tuning fork's vibrations in relation to electromagnetic devices like a microphone and a detector. The original poster seeks clarification on the ordinary differential equation (ODE) governing harmonic oscillators and how damping affects the system. Key equations are presented, including the ODE for a harmonic oscillator and its solution with damping. The conversation emphasizes the relationship between energy exchange in the tuning fork and the mathematical modeling of its motion. Overall, the thread highlights the complexity of understanding the mathematical framework behind tuning fork vibrations and resonance.
r.a.c.
Messages
20
Reaction score
0
This topic has proved itself to be a hard one in, in terms of looking it up online. I'm interested in simple harmonic motion, in specific that of a tuning fork vibrating between two electromagnetic devices, a microphone ad a detector.
My main interest in it is to write a lab report about an experiment I have conducted on a tuning fork.

I understand physically the notion of resonance (a frequency such that it pushes the fork always in just the right time to amplify it vibrations) but the mathematical side is somewhat difficult. So in terms of the electromagents in relation with the turning fork, can anyone please explain it to me in a bit more mathematical sense?

Also the effect of damping by placing a magnet in between the forks. Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
r.a.c. said:
I understand physically the notion of resonance (a frequency such that it pushes the fork always in just the right time to amplify it vibrations) but the mathematical side is somewhat difficult. So in terms of the electromagents in relation with the turning fork, can anyone please explain it to me in a bit more mathematical sense?
In a tuning fork, just like a simple pendulum, energy is being exchanged between motion and stored energy. In the case of the pendulum, the stored energy is gravitational: mgh. In the case of the tuning fork, it is like a spring where F = kx. The stored energy is: ½kx2, where k is the spring constant and x is displacement from equilibrium point.

Bob S
 
That much I know about the tuning fork. My point is the ODE of the harmonic oscillator. In fact we have the ODE
m\frac{d^2x}{dt^2} + b\frac{dx}{dt} + kx = F cos(wt)

Which leads eventually (with damping to)
x = Ae^-^\gamma ^t cos(w_1 t + \theta) + \frac{Fsin(wt+ \theta _0)m}{[(w^2_0 - w^2)^2 +4\gamma^2 w^2]^1/2}
 
Last edited:
I don't know why the Latex failed but anyway it is quite a complicated equation with a damping effect and the part without the damping. My question was how can you get to the ODE in the first and keep going and second how does the damping come in.
 
r.a.c. said:
That much I know about the tuning fork. My point is the ODE of the harmonic oscillator. In fact we have the ODE
m\frac{d^2x}{dt^2} + b\frac{dx}{dt} + kx = F cos(wt)

Which leads eventually (with damping to)
x = Ae^-^\gamma ^t cos(w_1 t + \theta) + \frac{Fsin(wt+ \theta _0)m}{[(w^2_0 - w^2)^2 +4\gamma^2 w^2]^1/2}
The tuning fork is not a forced oscillator, so the solution is

x = Ae^-^\gamma ^t cos(w_1 t + \theta)

Bob S
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top