Tupper's self-referential formula: A formula that plots itself

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Pythagorean
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Formula Plots
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around Tupper's self-referential formula, exploring its implications and the philosophical questions it raises about existence and knowledge. Participants express a mix of fascination and skepticism regarding the depth of meaning behind the formula and its comparison to concepts like the normality of pi.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants express amazement at Tupper's formula and its ability to plot itself.
  • Others question the depth of meaning behind the formula, suggesting it may not be as profound as it seems.
  • A participant draws a parallel between Tupper's formula and the idea that pi, if proven normal, contains all human knowledge encoded within its digits.
  • There is a humorous exchange regarding the nature of existence and whether a self-replicating formula could be considered "alive."
  • Some participants note that the claim about pi's normality remains unproven, adding a layer of uncertainty to the discussion.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally express a mix of admiration and skepticism regarding the significance of Tupper's formula, with no clear consensus on its depth or implications. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the philosophical interpretations of the formula and its comparisons to pi.

Contextual Notes

Some claims about the nature of pi and its normality are presented with uncertainty, as the proof of pi being normal has not yet been established.

Mathematics news on Phys.org
Truly amazing..
 
I'm compelled to find meaning in this or some secret to the nature of life... or some such pseudo intellectual crap.
 
heh, if it can reproduce, is it alive? :wink:
 
That's quine cute.
 
I remember Stephen Hawking commenting on the Theory of everything by questioning: "Is the unified theory so compelling that it brings about its own existence?" Atleast on a 2D plane, this equation does.
 
Last edited:
this has changed my life
 
Nice, but not very deep. Seems a bit like the initially surprising statement that pi (if it proves to be a normal number) contains the total sum of all human knowledge encoded in it digits, including complete video footage of every single humans life, whether dead, living or yet to be born, and interesting stuff like the list of lotto numbers in all times and a very detailed and accurate account of what happened to all your socks that went missing over the years. Its all there, tucked in between some fragments of noise.

[1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Normal_number
 
Filip Larsen said:
Nice, but not very deep. Seems a bit like the initially surprising statement that pi (if it proves to be a normal number) contains the total sum of all human knowledge encoded in it digits, including complete video footage of every single humans life, whether dead, living or yet to be born, and interesting stuff like the list of lotto numbers in all times and a very detailed and accurate account of what happened to all your socks that went missing over the years. Its all there, tucked in between some fragments of noise.

[1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Normal_number

To be fair, pi has not yet been proved normal.
 
  • #10
micromass said:
To be fair, pi has not yet been proved normal.
Takes one to know one :-p
 
  • #11
Ryan_m_b said:
Takes one to know one :-p

Boom roasted.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
5K