I Twin Paradox & Bondi K-Calculus: Who's Younger?

Mohammad Fajar
Messages
26
Reaction score
0
Bondi K-Calculus very depend on who was send the signal. If two twin A and B make a journey, A send a signal and B receiving the signal then yes after the journey A will see B younger, and this applied too for the case B sending a signal and A reflecting, then after the journey A will younger.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This is wrong. Please post your working in detail and we can work out where you went wrong.
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71
Mohammad Fajar said:
If two twin A and B make a journey
You need more details here too
 
Dale said:
You need more details here too
True. I assumed he was talking about a twin paradox scenario. If there's no return leg then the situation may well be symmetric.
 
Mohammad Fajar said:
Bondi K-Calculus very depend on who was send the signal.
One thing that you need to understand from the outset is that standard approaches are standard for a reason: they work. If you think that you have found a mistake in a standard approach then >99% it is your mistake. Please post accordingly. For example “When I try to use Bondi K-Calculus somehow it seems to depend on who sends the signal”
 
Mohammad Fajar said:
Bondi K-Calculus very depend on who was send the signal. If two twin A and B make a journey, A send a signal and B receiving the signal then yes after the journey A will see B younger, and this applied too for the case B sending a signal and A reflecting, then after the journey A will younger.

Some more details on the scenario are needed. Are you comparing A and B when they are at different locations (travelling away from each other), or are you comparing them when they're both at the same location (which implies that one of them turns around).
 
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...
Abstract The gravitational-wave signal GW250114 was observed by the two LIGO detectors with a network matched-filter signal-to-noise ratio of 80. The signal was emitted by the coalescence of two black holes with near-equal masses ## m_1=33.6_{-0.8}^{+1.2} M_{⊙} ## and ## m_2=32.2_{-1. 3}^{+0.8} M_{⊙}##, and small spins ##\chi_{1,2}\leq 0.26 ## (90% credibility) and negligible eccentricity ##e⁢\leq 0.03.## Postmerger data excluding the peak region are consistent with the dominant quadrupolar...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. The Relativator was sold by (as printed) Atomic Laboratories, Inc. 3086 Claremont Ave, Berkeley 5, California , which seems to be a division of Cenco Instruments (Central Scientific Company)... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/relativator-circular-slide-rule-simulated-with-desmos/ by @robphy
Back
Top