Two boxes with same initial velocity on a 2d track but one is at top of a hill

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving two boxes on a frictionless 2D track, one at the top of a hill and the other at the bottom, both with an initial velocity of 1 m/s. The first box, weighing 0.4 kg, accelerates down the incline, gaining speed in the vertical direction, while the second box, weighing 0.2 kg, remains on a flat section. It is argued that the first box will not collide with the second because its vertical momentum will be canceled out at the bottom of the hill, leaving it with its initial horizontal velocity. However, the importance of analyzing the forces acting on the first box, particularly the components of gravity on the incline, suggests that it will retain some horizontal momentum after descending. The conclusion is that the first box will not stop completely at the bottom and will indeed have horizontal velocity, potentially leading to a collision.
JPHL
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I'm trying to understand a problem someone gave me recently. there is a frictionless track that initially starts flat then there is an incline of 20 degrees then it levels out again at the bottom of the incline. you have two masses, 1 is .4 kg and is located at the top of the hill and has an initial speed of 1 m/s towards the end of the track. The second mass is 0.2 kg and is located on the flat section at the bottom of the hill and also has an initial speed of 1 m/s in the direction of the track. Will these two masses collide? I'm thinking they won't since while the first box is on the ramp the speed will increase but only in the y-component and when the box gets to the bottom of the hill the track would exert a force canceling that gained momentum out entirely leaving it with its initial velocity and since they both have the same velocity they won't ever actually collide will they?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hhhhmmm...so, if you have a mass with zero initial horizontal velocity at the top of the hill and you let go of it...will it stop on its tracks as soon as it gets to the bottom of the hill? or will it shot out of there?

I think you need a free body diagram of the body in the middle of the hill, see how the pull of gravity against an inclined plane will results into components normal and parallel to it, effectively increasing the speed of the mass along the track...then, at the bottom of the hill, you again have the mass coming in at an angle and so the flat of the track can only cancel the vertical component of it, but there should be a horizontal remaining.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top