Calculating Energy of Two Masses on a Spring

  • Thread starter Thread starter bessletama
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mass Spring
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the energy of a macroscopic oscillator consisting of two equal masses attached to a spring, oscillating in a frictionless environment. The initial assumption is that the masses are at either end of the spring, with their motion described by a cosine curve. The participant derives the velocity and proposes an energy calculation based on one mass's motion, but is advised to consider the relative motion of both masses. It's suggested that simplifying the problem is possible if the masses move antisymmetrically with the same amplitude. The conversation emphasizes the importance of accurately modeling the system to derive the correct energy expression.
bessletama
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Consider the following macroscopic oscillator: Two masses of equal mass are attached to a spring and oscillate with amplitude A at frequency v. Use classical physics to calculate the energy of the oscillator.


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


This question doesn't say much about where the mass is attached or what environment this oscillator is in so I assumed that we're in a friction-less environment and the mass is attached on either end of the spring. Please tell me if that is incorrect.
Based on that assumption, I know that the position of one of the mass would travel in a cosine curve. So we have p(t)=A*cos(2*pi*v*x). I can take the derivative of this to get the velocity v(t)=-2*pi*A*v*sin(2*pi*v*x). The maximum velocity is when t=1/(4v). Let's call this new velocity V. Now the energy of the spring should be 2*((1/2)*m*V^2). Is this correct? Or is there another way to do it.

Thanks in advance!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I assumed that we're in a friction-less environment and the mass is attached on either end of the spring. Please tell me if that is incorrect.
You should verify the assumption ... but it is what I'd do.

What you seem to have done is considered the motion of just one mass, assuming the other one is stationary.

The force on the masses depends on their relative positions - so you'd work out the free body diagram and solve the resulting differential equation.

If their motion is antisymmetric with the same amplitude, then you can simplify the problem quite a lot.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top