Two masses connected by spring rotate around one axis

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on deriving the Lagrangian for a system of two masses connected by a spring, rotating around the x-axis with constant angular velocity. The potential energy includes gravitational effects on mass m1 and the spring's potential energy, while the kinetic energy is expressed in terms of the velocities of both masses. There is confusion regarding the kinetic energy term, particularly in the context of a non-inertial frame due to rotation. The solution involves considering an inertial frame and using cylindrical coordinates to reformulate the Lagrangian in terms of the generalized coordinates x and y. Ultimately, understanding the relationship between inertial and non-inertial frames is crucial for correctly formulating the Lagrangian.
YellowBiro
Messages
8
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



Take the x-axis to be pointing perpendicularly upwards.

Mass ##m_1## slides freely along the x-axis. Mass ##m_2## slides freely along the y-axis. The masses are connected by a spring, with spring constant ##k## and relaxed length ##l_0##. The whole system rotates with constant angular velocity ##\omega## around the x-axis. Determine the Lagrangian in terms of generalized coordinates ##x## and ##y##.

Homework Equations



$$L = T - U$$
$$F=mg$$
$$F=-kx$$
$$P.E. = mgh$$
$$P.E. = -\frac{1}{2}kx_e^2$$

The Attempt at a Solution



So ##m_1## is affected by gravity so we have ## -m_1gx ##. The potential in the string is ##\frac{1}{2}k(d-l_0)^2## where ##d^2 = x^2 + y^2##.

So $$U = -m_1gx + \frac{1}{2}k(d-l_0)^2$$

$$T = \frac{1}{2}m_1\dot{x}^2 + \frac{1}{2}m_2\dot{y}^2$$

Is this correct? It feels wrong, but I don't know why. I think my ##T## is wrong though. Shouldn't it be zero? But if it is, I cannot get any eom, later on. I am confused by the fact that I am working within a non-inertial frame, the rotating one.
 
  • Like
Likes berkeman
Physics news on Phys.org
Why do you think the kinetic energy should be zero? Also, how do you take into account the fact that the system is rotating? What will this add to your energies?

While you are working with what is coordinates in a non-inertial frame, nothing stops you from thinking about how they relate to coordinates in an inertial frame.
 
Just to close this thread.

The solution is that you consider the inertial frame of reference and write your Lagrangian in cylinderical coordinates. Then it turns out that you can reformat it into ##x## and ##y## since the angular speed is a constant.
 

Similar threads

Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
5K