Two moving blocks, find small blocks final velocity

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on determining the final velocity of a small block sliding down a circular path on a larger block, both of which are frictionless and initially at rest. The user expresses confusion over the reference frame due to the movement of both blocks, suggesting that the angles may not remain consistent when the small block loses contact. There is a suggestion to consider the energy in the system, specifically the gravitational potential energy available as m*g*R. Additionally, the importance of the center of mass remaining unchanged in the absence of external forces is highlighted. The conversation emphasizes the need to analyze the dynamics and energy conservation in this two-block system.
toastie
Messages
46
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A small block (mass m) slides down a circular path (radius R) which is cut into a large block (mass M), as shown. M rests on a table and both blocks slide without friction. The blocks are initially at rest, and m starts at the top of the path. Determine the velocity of m when it loses contact with the large block.
Data: M = 3.4 kg; m = 1.2 kg; R = 0.7 m.

Homework Equations


Using basic geometry I have solved a = (angular velocity^2)*r*cos(phi)cos(theta)

The Attempt at a Solution


Using the above equation though, I believe to be in the wrong refrence frame since both blocks are moving. Thus, the 90 degree refrence angles will not be 90 when the small block is no longer touching the large block.

Thank you in advance!
 

Attachments

  • 4-04.jpg
    4-04.jpg
    11 KB · Views: 388
Physics news on Phys.org
Maybe consider the energy that's in the system?

Don't you have a total of m*g*R available?

And won't the Center of Mass in the absence of external forces need to be in the same position when the small block exits?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top