Two Particles in a Box: Similar Velocities, Momentum, or Kinetic Energy?

AI Thread Summary
In a box with two interacting particles, it is suggested that their momenta would likely approach equality over many interactions, especially during collisions. This is based on the idea that momentum tends to be conserved and redistributed during physical interactions. In contrast, the velocities and kinetic energies of the particles may not converge in the same way. The discussion references a thermodynamic theorem indicating that identical particles will, on average, have equal kinetic energies due to energy distribution among degrees of freedom. Overall, the behavior of these particles is influenced by their interactions and the nature of their collisions.
nonequilibrium
Messages
1,412
Reaction score
2
Hello,

Say you have a box with two (interacting) particles in them. If you had to venture a guess, what would be most reasonable: that they both have similar velocities, similar momenta or similar kinetic energies? (Or perhaps none of the above?)

NB: with "similar" I mean "of comparable magnitude"
 
Physics news on Phys.org


I'd say that this question can't probably be answered in a general way. If the interaction involved is physical (like the two particles bouncing into each other), my guess would be that over an arbitrarily large amount of interactions the two particles momenta would approach equality. I would say neither of the other two values would approach each other, and that this situation would change if the interaction changed.
 


And why would you think that the momenta would approach equality?
 


More a guess than anything, it seems to be than in realistic collisions between two bodies the difference in momentum would be less after the collision.
 


Actually, there is a theorem in Thermodynamics that states that on average, available energy is distributed equally between available degrees of freedom. That means that if particles are identical, they will, on average, have equal kinetic energies.
 
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top