Two physics KE/PE questions(and possibly more, studying for a test)

axforts
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



a carpenter moves his .5 kg hammer at 3m/s when it contacts a nail. The nail receives an average force of 75N as it is driven 2cm int the wood board. The carpenter notices that the nail feels warm after he hits it with the hammer. How much heat energy was transferred to the nail.

Homework Equations


W = fd

The Attempt at a Solution



work w =force Fx distsnce D
w=75nx.02m
w=1.5j

Maybe I am supposed to do Ke = .5mv^2 and get 2.25J, then 2.25- 1.5J = .75J?

Except that was wrong?
Next problem

How much work is done by accelerating a 1200kg card from rest to a speed of 12m/s while it is movin up a frictionless hill that is 18m high.

force = mass x acceleration F= 1200x12=14400n
w=force x distance w=14400x18=259200j
=259.2kj

Except my friend is getting 298080J. Not sure whos right here. Thanks everyone!

Hes doing
W = mg(18) + .5m(12)^2
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
When you calculate the work, you do need to take into account any change in potential energy. Try that for the first problem and see if it gets you a better result.
 
So for the first one, I tried

5mv^2 + mgh = W + Q
W = fd = 75N * .02m
= 1.5J
.5(.5kg)(3m/s)^2 = 2.25J
= KE
.5kg * 9.8m/s^2 * .02m = PE = .98J
2.25+ .98 = 1.5 + Q

So is Q 1.73J?
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top