Two qubit state multiplication

R_physics
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hi guys having a little trouble with two-qubit state multiplication.

Could you tell me how you work out the following? (not only the answers but the working out) I need to be able to understand these calculations before I can move on to the next step of an entanglement question. I understand single qubit bra and ket notation for example |0><0|. And I know |00> means the tensor product of |0> and |0> but I am struggling to compute the following:

|00><00| = ?
|00><01| = ?
|00><10| = ?
|00><11| = ?

|01><00| = ?
|01><01| = ?
|01><10| = ?
|01><11| = ?

|10><00| = ?
|10><01| = ?
|10><10| = ?
|10><11| = ?

|11><00| = ?
|11><01| = ?
|11><10| = ?
|11><11| = ?

Thanks in advance. (ps i hope i posted this in the right place, please move it if not)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What do you mean by compute? I assume that you want the matrix representation in the |00>,|01>,|10>,|11>.

You have written out all 16 possible ket-bra combinations for two quibits. Each operator corresponds to a 4x4 matrix, where one entry is a one and the others are zero. You could calculate all these matrices by writing out the kets resp. bras as column resp. row vectors. If you have done this for one or two expressions, you will immediately see how the others have to look like.

For real calculations, it helps to know that every operator A can be written as A = Ʃi,j|ai><ai|A|aj><aj| = Ʃi,jaij|ai><aj|. So you don't have to write any matrices, you can always stick to the bra ket notation.
 
Last edited:
Thanks you for your reply. Yes I will be doing calculations with it and I should keep it in bra and ket notation. Can you explain those equations you wrote? I think that is exactly what I have to use, but don't understand it. Thanks again for the reply
 
It's hard to answer if I don't know what exactly you don't understand.

Let's take the simple example of a single qubit. The basis elements |ai> then are simply |0> and |1>. Now how does A = Ʃi,jaij|ai><aj| look like?
 
A = Ʃi,jaij|ai><aj|

To be honest from this I understand, correct me if I'm wrong:

|ai><aj| = outer product

if |ai> is |0> and |1> does <aj| represent <0| and <1| or have i completely misunderstood this?

thanks again for the reply
 
Yes that's right, so our arbitrary operator A looks like this:
A = a00|0><0| + a10|1><0| + a01|0><1| + a11|1><1|

|0> and |1> are represented by column vectors (1,0)T and (0,1)T, <0| and <1| by row vectors (1,0) and (0,1). Do you know how to calculate the outer products using this? What you get is the matrix
Code:
a[SUB]00[/SUB] a[SUB]01[/SUB]
a[SUB]10[/SUB] a[SUB]11[/SUB]
Here are a few examples and their matrix forms:
σz = |0><0| - |1><1|
Code:
1 0
0 -1
σx = |1><0| + |0><1|
Code:
0 1
1 0
σ+ = |1><0| (if you apply this operator to |0> you get |1>, hence it is the raising operator)
Code:
0 0
1 0
 
Last edited:
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...

Similar threads

Back
Top