Two real-valued functions on a real vector space

noowutah
Messages
56
Reaction score
3
I have a fixed function U and a function f
that I want to know something about, both from
\mathbb{R}^{n}\rightarrow\mathbb{R}, for which I know
condition (G) that U(x)\geq{}U(y) implies
f(x)\geq{}f(y). f=U and f=x_{0}
for any x_{0}\in{}\mathbb{R} trivially fulfill (G). Which
f fulfills (G) non-trivially? Are there additional
assumptions (continuity for example) which would allow me to claim
that there is no f that non-trivially fulfills (G)?

This question will help me solve a set-theoretic puzzle based on
Debreu's theorem -- that's why I've put the thread in this category.
U stands for the utility function, f for a less discriminating
utility function that is not trivially f=U or constant.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
stlukits said:
Which f fulfills (G) non-trivially?

I think we need a definition of "non-trivially". Is f(x) = 3 U(x) + 6 a trivial or non-trivial fullfillment?
 
Sorry, yes, I left out something important. I need f to
be LESS discriminating than U. So, I want
\exists{}x,y\in\mathbb{R}^{n} with x\neq{}y
and f(x)=f(y), whereas U(x)>U(y).

I think I've answered my own question. Yes, there is a continuous
f (given a continuous U) which fulfills (G)
is neither U nor constant. The only constraint is that,
if the functions are differentiable, f'(x)U'(x) is
non-negative. For my less-discriminating condition, the function must
be zero somewhere where U is monotonically increasing.

Thanks, I think I can take it from here.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Namaste & G'day Postulate: A strongly-knit team wins on average over a less knit one Fundamentals: - Two teams face off with 4 players each - A polo team consists of players that each have assigned to them a measure of their ability (called a "Handicap" - 10 is highest, -2 lowest) I attempted to measure close-knitness of a team in terms of standard deviation (SD) of handicaps of the players. Failure: It turns out that, more often than, a team with a higher SD wins. In my language, that...
Back
Top