Type Exponents as Superscript - E6S

  • Thread starter Thread starter Echo 6 Sierra
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Exponents
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on how to type exponents as superscripts in E6S, specifically using the format x[ sup ]2[ /sup ]. Users are seeking a solution to display exponents correctly instead of the standard notation (x^2). The method suggested mimics HTML formatting but uses brackets instead of angle brackets. Participants confirm the effectiveness of this approach while humorously referencing a payment for a hamburger. The conversation highlights a straightforward solution for typing superscripts in E6S.
Echo 6 Sierra
Messages
30
Reaction score
2
I'm sure I've seen it...I've searched under "typing exponents" , "how exponents" and "superscript" and can't come up with a thread on getting exponents to show as superscript rather than (x^2).

I will gladly pay you Tuesday for a hamburger today.

Thank you in advance. E6S
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
try x2
that is x[ sup ]2[ /sup ] without spaces
just like HTML but with [ ] instead of < >
 
x2
did this work?
 
just don't forget the hamburger
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top