UG research- Actually doing research more important than relevance of field?

AI Thread Summary
Graduate school admissions place significant value on research experience, often prioritizing it over the direct relevance of that experience to the intended field of study. Engaging in research, regardless of its specific focus, demonstrates essential skills and a commitment to scholarly work. While having relevant research experience can be beneficial, many undergraduates may not have access to projects aligned with their graduate interests or may still be exploring their academic paths. Ultimately, the ability to showcase research skills, publications, and a genuine interest in the work is crucial for admissions committees, as these factors indicate a candidate's potential for success in graduate studies.
Fizicks1
Messages
41
Reaction score
0
When graduate school admissions look at your undergrad research experience, does it matter that much whether the field research experience have any relevance to the field you want to pursue in graduate school?


Or in other words, is actually doing research and acquiring research experience is much more important than whether the field of research has anything to do with what you want to pursue in graduate school?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Bit of both.

I applied to projects that had nothing to do with my summer placements, but they really liked that I did lab experience and publications. I ended up doing a project in the same field of my placements because I was comfortable with it and quite enjoyed the project.

So, relevance is good but research experience is the most important factor. And an interest in the project helps.
 
Fizicks1 said:
Or in other words, is actually doing research and acquiring research experience is much more important than whether the field of research has anything to do with what you want to pursue in graduate school?

Yes.

Many undergrads simply won't have access to projects in the graduate field they want to pursue. Others simple won't know what they want to pursue. Sometimes you might think you'll like one field and then find out you really dislike it once you start working in it - and realize that there's another field that fits with you much better.
 
After a year of thought, I decided to adjust my ratio for applying the US/EU(+UK) schools. I mostly focused on the US schools before, but things are getting complex and I found out that Europe is also a good place to study. I found some institutes that have professors with similar interests. But gaining the information is much harder than US schools (like you have to contact professors in advance etc). For your information, I have B.S. in engineering (low GPA: 3.2/4.0) in Asia - one SCI...
Bit Britain-specific but I was wondering, what's the best path to take for A-Levels out of the following (I know Y10 seems a bit early to be thinking about A-levels, but my choice will impact what I do this year/ in y11) I (almost) definitely want to do physics at University - so keep that in mind... The subjects that I'm almost definitely going to take are Maths, Further Maths and Physics, and I'm taking a fast track programme which means that I'll be taking AS computer science at the end...
I graduated with a BSc in Physics in 2020. Since there were limited opportunities in my country (mostly teaching), I decided to improve my programming skills and began working in IT, first as a software engineer and later as a quality assurance engineer, where I’ve now spent about 3 years. While this career path has provided financial stability, I’ve realized that my excitement and passion aren’t really there, unlike what I felt when studying or doing research in physics. Working in IT...

Similar threads

Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
4K
Replies
14
Views
3K
Back
Top