Uncertainity and Error Question

  • Thread starter Thread starter inno87
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Error
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the volume of a cylindrical cookie with given dimensions and uncertainties. The most likely volume is determined to be 19.634 cm³, with an absolute uncertainty of 0.11 cm³, resulting in a percent uncertainty of approximately 0.56%. A question arises regarding how to adjust the diameter's uncertainty to achieve a volume uncertainty of ±3%, indicating confusion about the calculations. The poster seeks clarification on their approach, highlighting a lack of confidence in handling uncertainty in measurements.
inno87
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
I'm not sure if I am doing this right, can anyone help me out?

A cylindrical cookie has a diameter of 5.0 \pm 0.1 cm, and a thickness of 1.00 \pm 0.01 cm.

A. Assuming the uncertainities are normally distrubited, what is the most likely value of the volume of the cookie?

V=pi*(d/2)^2*h=pi*(1 \pm .01 cm * [(5.0 \pm .1 cm)/2]^2=pi*[1 \pm .01 cm * (2.5 \pm .05 cm)^2=pi*[1 \pm .01 cm * 6.25 \pm .1 cm^2]=pi* 6.25 \pm .11 cm^3 = 19.634 \pm .11 cm^3

Most likely volume is 19.634 cm^3

B. What is the percent uncertainty in the volume?
.11/19.634=.5603%

C. What is the absolute uncertainty in the volume?
.11 cm^3 (taken from question 1)

D. Assuming the thickness uncertainity remains \pm .01 cm, to what value would the diameter's uncertainty (in cm) have to be reduced in order to make the uncertainty in the volume \pm 3%?

I tried setting up something like (.01+D_unc)/(19.634)=.03 but that would mean you'd have to increase the uncertainty so it seems I may have done something wrong here!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Anyone have an answer to this? I'm still very unstable about this uncertainty question.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top