Uncertainty principle, virtual particle pairs and energy

Darkmisc
Messages
222
Reaction score
31
I'm a bit confused about how the uncertainty principle allows for the spontaneous creation and annihilation of virtual particle pairs.

I can understand that energy conservation can be violated for a very short time as per delta_e*delta_t > h_bar/2. However, when the virtual particle pair annihilates, does it result in the emission of a photon with e = 2mc^2?

Does this photon propagate like a normal photon? By what mechanism does it disappear again into zero energy so that energy conservation is not violated permanently?


Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Darkmisc, You understand wrong. Energy conservation is not like a bank account, it's an absolute law of nature. It holds true exactly, at every moment.

When a virtual photon is emitted by an electron, any energy or momentum carried by the photon is temporarily lost by the electron. They are both "off the mass shell", or virtual. When the photon is reabsorbed, again energy conservation holds, and the electron regains the total energy that it had originally.
 
Bill_K said:
Darkmisc, You understand wrong. Energy conservation is not like a bank account, it's an absolute law of nature. It holds true exactly, at every moment.

When a virtual photon is emitted by an electron, any energy or momentum carried by the photon is temporarily lost by the electron. They are both "off the mass shell", or virtual. When the photon is reabsorbed, again energy conservation holds, and the electron regains the total energy that it had originally.


I still don't get it. What does "off the mass shell" mean?

The trouble I'm having is with the idea that virtual particle pairs can appear without the final outcome being that the energy they instantaneously possessed returns to zero.

The way I understand the uncertainty principle as it relates to energy is that you cannot know with absolute certainty that the energy will be zero. I'm picturing the energy in the space always being very close to zero, but fluctuating thereabouts.

Do you mean that energy conversation holds because when the photon is absorbed, it lowers the momentum of some other particle?
 
For any free particle there is a relationship E2 = p2c2 + m2c4 where E is energy, p is the momentum and m is the rest mass. For example when a particle is sitting still, p = 0 and the relationship reduces to E = mc2. On the other hand for a massless particle like a photon, m = 0 and the relationship reduces to E = pc. This relationship between E and p is called the "mass shell."

On the other hand when a particle is virtual, the relationship does not necessarily hold. It is "off the mass shell." When particles interact, energy and momentum are conserved. Not just approximately - exactly. If an electron with energy E and momentum p emits a photon with energy E1 and momentum p1, after the collision the electron will now have energy E - E1 and momentum p - p1. Yes there is uncertainty about what E1 and P1 will be, but there is no uncertainty about the conservation. The sum for electron and photon will always be the same. After the photon is reabsorbed, the electron will again have energy E and momentum p. Total energy does not fluctuate. Ever.
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
29
Views
3K
Replies
20
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Back
Top