Uncovering Fusion Efficiency: Comparing Fusion and Fission in Energy Conversion

  • Thread starter Thread starter mattmac.nuke
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Efficiency Fusion
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the efficiency of mass conversion to energy in fusion compared to fission. Participants seek academic sources to support the claim that fusion is more efficient. Hyperphysics is suggested as a potential source, but there is a preference for textbook references. Recommendations include using encyclopedias on physics and searching for books on plasma physics in school libraries. The conversation emphasizes the importance of credible sources for technical writing in engineering.
mattmac.nuke
Messages
22
Reaction score
0
The efficiency to which I am referring is the amount of mass converted to energy. I need to find an academic source to cite that fusion is more efficient in this respect than fission.

Any sources?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
mattmac.nuke said:
The efficiency to which I am referring is the amount of mass converted to energy. I need to find an academic source to cite that fusion is more efficient in this respect than fission.

Any sources?

Does Hyperphysics qualify?

http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/nucene/nucbin.html

Or do you need a texbook source for the information on Binding Energy?
 
Well, it is a .edu site... I really think it should, I mean, this paper isn't even for a science course, it's technical writing for engineers. The only way I could bear through the paper was to write about a topic that I really enjoy!

Though I am interested in finding a textbook source for this.
 
mattmac.nuke said:
Well, it is a .edu site... I really think it should, I mean, this paper isn't even for a science course, it's technical writing for engineers. The only way I could bear through the paper was to write about a topic that I really enjoy!

Though I am interested in finding a textbook source for this.

You may be able to just use an encyclopedia to find the usual discussion of Binding Energy. Certainly any Physics Encyclopedia will have that topic. You can also look for books in your school library on Plasma Physics.
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • Poll Poll
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
16K
Replies
70
Views
10K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Back
Top