History Uncovering the Hidden History of London: The Trojan Connection

AI Thread Summary
The early inhabitants of Britain, predating the Roman invasion, are believed to be descendants of the fallen city of Troy, establishing a settlement on the Thames named "Troia Newydd," later known as "Troynovant" or "Trinovantum." King Lud re-named the city "Caer-Ludd" around 73 BC, which evolved into London. The re-naming has obscured historical connections to ancient Troy and has implications for understanding British ancestry, linking it to biblical figures like Noah. The popularity of Homer's works in Roman times led to widespread claims of Trojan descent across Europe, though these claims lack concrete evidence. There are no known artifacts from this period, but mitochondrial DNA research and the discovery of megalithic sites with human remains over 30,000 years old may provide further insights into early British history.
wolram
Gold Member
Dearly Missed
Messages
4,410
Reaction score
555
http://www.annomundi.com/history/trojan_london.htm

The early inhabitants of Britain, who arrived more than a thousand years before the Roman invasion, were the scattered remnants of the fallen city of Troy. They founded a city on the Thames and called it "Troia Newydd" (New Troy) which later became "Troynovant" or "Trinovantum".
King Lud (73 BC) re-named it "Caer-Ludd" (Lud's Town). It later became known as Kaerlundein and then London. When Lud died, he was buried near a gateway called Porthlud, which the Saxons called Ludgate.
The re-naming of the city has been a disaster for British history. Not only have we forgotten our links with ancient Troy, but we have also given ground to the advocates of evolution, who don't want us to know that, through the Trojans, we can trace our ancestry all the way back to Noah.
 
Science news on Phys.org
Once Homer's Illiad and Odyssey were popularized by the Romans (Vergil, who wrote the Aeneiad, Roman) everyone in Europe claimed to be descended from Trojans fleeing the sack of Troy. That doesn't make it true.
 
HallsofIvy said:
Once Homer's Illiad and Odyssey were popularized by the Romans (Vergil, who wrote the Aeneiad, Roman) everyone in Europe claimed to be descended from Trojans fleeing the sack of Troy. That doesn't make it true.

AFAIK they left no artifacts, but there may be a kernel of truth in some of these writings.

http://www.biblefacts.org/myth/chronicle_of_the_early_britons.pdf
 
Last edited by a moderator:
It seems that a decent mitochondrial DNA research could be more convincing.

Also there are some Megalithic sites around the North Sea with human remains dated >30,000 years.
 
Historian seeks recognition for first English king https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c9d07w50e15o Somewhere I have a list of Anglo-Saxon, Wessex and English kings. Well there is nothing new there. Parts of Britain experienced tribal rivalries/conflicts as well as invasions by the Romans, Vikings/Norsemen, Angles, Saxons and Jutes, then Normans, and various monarchs/emperors declared war on other monarchs/emperors. Seems that behavior has not ceased.

Similar threads

Replies
65
Views
10K
Back
Top