A Uncovering the Mysteries of Dark Matter's Energy Content

AI Thread Summary
Harvard scientist Lisa Randall's statement that dark matter carries five times the energy of ordinary matter refers to its significant mass-energy contribution in the universe. Dark matter constitutes about five times more mass than normal matter, but it is essential to consider the role of dark energy as well. The discussion clarifies that E=mc² applies to dark matter, affirming its energy equivalence. Some participants suggest that Randall could have framed her statement to include dark matter's proportion of the total mass-energy content of the universe. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the complexity of dark matter's relationship with energy and mass in cosmology.
DLSieving
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
What is meant by the statement by Harvard scientist Lisa Randall that dark matter carries five times the energy of ordinary matter? Does E=mc2 not apply to dark matter? Does the statement refer to ordinary energy or to dark energy?
 
Space news on Phys.org
DLSieving said:
What is meant by the statement by Harvard scientist Lisa Randall that dark matter carries five times the energy of ordinary matter? Does E=mc2 not apply to dark matter? Does the statement refer to ordinary energy or to dark energy?
There's about five times as much mass in our universe in dark matter as there is in normal matter.
 
Ok thanks. She should have said something more like "Dark matter accounts for five sixths of the total massenergy content of the universe."
 
DLSieving said:
Ok thanks. She should have said something more like "Dark matter accounts for five sixths of the total massenergy content of the universe."
No, that's not an accurate statement, as there's also dark energy. Her statement was accurate as-is.
 
I thank you for your original answer, which makes perfect sense.
 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recombination_(cosmology) Was a matter density right after the decoupling low enough to consider the vacuum as the actual vacuum, and not the medium through which the light propagates with the speed lower than ##({\epsilon_0\mu_0})^{-1/2}##? I'm asking this in context of the calculation of the observable universe radius, where the time integral of the inverse of the scale factor is multiplied by the constant speed of light ##c##.
The formal paper is here. The Rutgers University news has published a story about an image being closely examined at their New Brunswick campus. Here is an excerpt: Computer modeling of the gravitational lens by Keeton and Eid showed that the four visible foreground galaxies causing the gravitational bending couldn’t explain the details of the five-image pattern. Only with the addition of a large, invisible mass, in this case, a dark matter halo, could the model match the observations...
Hi, I’m pretty new to cosmology and I’m trying to get my head around the Big Bang and the potential infinite extent of the universe as a whole. There’s lots of misleading info out there but this forum and a few others have helped me and I just wanted to check I have the right idea. The Big Bang was the creation of space and time. At this instant t=0 space was infinite in size but the scale factor was zero. I’m picturing it (hopefully correctly) like an excel spreadsheet with infinite...

Similar threads

Back
Top