Formation of dark matter structures

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the formation of dark matter structures from an initially uniform distribution, referencing simulations from the Eagle project. Participants clarify that dark matter can lose energy through gravitational interactions, albeit at a slower rate than electromagnetic interactions. They explain that gravitational radiation and momentum transfer among dark matter particles facilitate structure formation. Additionally, the conversation highlights that on large scales, structures do not collapse due to the dynamics of expansion and density, leading to stable orbits instead.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of gravitational interactions and gravitational radiation
  • Familiarity with dark matter and its properties
  • Knowledge of cosmological simulations, specifically the Eagle project
  • Concepts of linearized gravity and its limitations
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore gravitational radiation and its role in energy dissipation
  • Research the dynamics of dark matter interactions and momentum transfer
  • Study the implications of dark energy on cosmic structure formation
  • Investigate the Eagle project simulations for insights into dark matter behavior
USEFUL FOR

Astronomers, astrophysicists, and cosmologists interested in the mechanisms of dark matter structure formation and the dynamics of the universe's expansion.

andrew s 1905
Messages
238
Reaction score
95
TL;DR
I can't understand how dark matter can form structures from the initial near uniform distribution.
So my question is what physics allows this to happen?
I can't understand how dark matter can form structures from the initial near uniform distribution as shown in simulation like those of the Eagle project http://icc.dur.ac.uk/Eagle/index.php. I understand how the initial density fluctuation are amplified and dark (and ordinary) matter start to collapse However, unlike ordinary matter which can lose energy via electromagnetic interactions, dark matter will gain kinetic energy from the gravitational potential energy of the initial distribution but this cannot be dissipated and so should in my naive view oscillate about the local center of mass.

This must be wrong but what physics am I missing in understanding this. I have tried various google searches but not found a solution. Any pointers would be most welcome.

Regards Andrew
 
Space news on Phys.org
Dark matter can lose energy by gravitational interaction via the emission of gravitational radiation. Given that the gravitational interaction is much weaker than the electromagnetic, This is a much slower process. Also, gravitational interactions between DM particles can transfer momentum from one to another( much like a gravitational slingshot does), which can also aid in forming structures.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: andrew s 1905
Thanks, for the replies. I think I have worked it out. My assumption about the potential energy was wrong.
Regards Andrew
 
One interesting thing about this problem is that on very large scales, structures don't collapse. This derives from using linearized gravity to estimate how structures evolve over time. This fact probably matches more with your original intuition: that conservation of energy would prevent collapse.

So how can there be these huge structures at all if they don't collapse? The answer is pretty simple: at some point, the rate of expansion was slow enough and the systems were dense enough that they settled into stable orbits instead of continuing to expand. Meanwhile, the overdense regions continue to get further apart and the rest of the universe gets less dense. So the density of these large regions is sort of "baked in" by how long ago they stopped expanding, with some settling into stable configurations younger than others.

That said, gravity isn't a linear theory, so this approximation breaks down as you look at smaller structures (such as galaxy clusters and individual galaxies). This leads to more complicated evolution. And dark energy also changes things so that the gravitational potentials of these large regions aren't actually constant.

Finally, note that my description is compatible with the one that Keith posted above. It's just described from a different perspective.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: andrew s 1905

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • Featured
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
5K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K
  • · Replies 37 ·
2
Replies
37
Views
6K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
4K
  • · Replies 69 ·
3
Replies
69
Views
10K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K