Uncovering the Mysteries of the Universe: Questions, Answers, and Theories

  • Thread starter Thread starter wolram
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion explores fundamental questions about the universe, including its structure, the existence of dark energy and dark matter, and the constants that govern it. It emphasizes the importance of testability in theories, suggesting that a theory must make experimentally testable predictions to be considered valid. The selection of theories involves conducting experiments and evaluating past evidence to discard disproven ideas. While the possibility of a perfect model of the universe is debated, it is suggested that such a model may be unlikely due to the inherent complexities and gaps in our understanding. Ultimately, the conversation highlights the ongoing quest for knowledge in the face of many unanswered questions about the universe.
wolram
Gold Member
Dearly Missed
Messages
4,410
Reaction score
555
their are so many questions and so few answers, is the universe open
closed? is it infinite or finite? does dark energy, dark matter exist?
What are the constants that govern our universe? I have read many
papers that tweek known parameters, or invoke new theories, most
have no testability without more new data, or may be impossible to
disprove.
So my question is what tests are needed to qualify a theory?
How do you select which theory is correct?
what tests are needed to aid a selection?
can we ever have a perfect model of our universe?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
what tests are needed to qualify a theory?
A theory is useful if it can make predictions which are experimentally testable. Specific tests depend on what the theory is about.
How do you select which theory is correct?
what tests are needed to aid a selection?
When there are competing theories, they will usually make predictions which are different. Perform the experiment measuring them. Alternatively, theories that may look different turn out to be equivalent - example, quantum mechanics in the 1920's Heisenberg and Schroedinger.
can we ever have a perfect model of our universe?
Ever is a long time, but based on past experience, it is highly unlikely.
 
wolram said:
their are so many questions and so few answers, is the universe open
closed? is it infinite or finite? does dark energy, dark matter exist?
What are the constants that govern our universe? I have read many
papers that tweek known parameters, or invoke new theories, most
have no testability without more new data, or may be impossible to
disprove.


So my question is what tests are needed to qualify a theory?

Somebody writes a paper proposing it, orally proposes it, or thinks about it in their head. Once done if the statement is proposed to explain something it is a theory. Subcategories of theories are theories about physics and publish theories about physics. The really good theories of physics of any significant duration are published theories about physics.

How do you select which theory is correct?

You do experiments and look at past evidence. You dump the theories that are disproven. You keep the rest in the running and use the ones that are convenient the most.

what tests are needed to aid a selection?

Logic and experimental experience.

can we ever have a perfect model of our universe?

What is a perfect model. If a perfect model is analogous to the rules of chess. Yes. If the perfect model is analagous to the rules of chess plus a recounting of every move that got us to how the board looks today, probably not.

Similarly, we may someday determine every method of genetic change that has ever taken place in evolutionary history. But, because the fossil record is incomplete there will be some species in our evolutionary history which may never be known.
 
wolram said:
can we ever have a perfect model of our universe?

I think the Universe is infinitely divisible but math will always be able to describe it although only imperfectly. The metaphor I use is zooming into the Mandelbrot Set attempting to find the connections between nested sets only to find they have grown smaller still !

SD
 
Publication: Redox-driven mineral and organic associations in Jezero Crater, Mars Article: NASA Says Mars Rover Discovered Potential Biosignature Last Year Press conference The ~100 authors don't find a good way this could have formed without life, but also can't rule it out. Now that they have shared their findings with the larger community someone else might find an explanation - or maybe it was actually made by life.
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Back
Top