Uncovering the Mystery of "-2" in Momentum X

  • Thread starter Thread starter tanmandu
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Momentum Mystery
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on understanding the origin of the "-2" in the change of momentum formula for a steel ball bouncing off a wall. The formula used is Change in Momentum in the X = -2MVcos(), where M is mass and V is velocity. The "-2" arises because the ball's momentum changes direction upon impact, resulting in a negative final momentum. The user successfully calculated the average force exerted on the ball to be 323.369 N after applying the formula. The clarification on the formula's derivation helped solidify the understanding of momentum as a vector quantity.
tanmandu
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Trying to Understand Where this Constant Came From in the "X component of Momentum"

After asking for help on this problem, my professor showed me how to derive the forumla needed to solve the following question. However, it sliped my mine to ask where the "-2" came from.

Homework Statement


A 7kg steel ball strikes a wall with a speed of 8.74m/s at a angle of 37.3 degrees with the normal of the wall. It bounces off with the same speed and angle. If the ball is in contact with the wall for 0.301 seconds, what is the average force exerted on the ball by the wall?


Homework Equations



Change in Momentum in the X=-2MVcos()

The Attempt at a Solution



Using the formula, and knowing the is no change in the momentum in the Y direction I found the answer to be 323.369 N.

Like I said, what I am unclear about is where the -2 came from in the formula. Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org


Change in momentum = Momentum after impact - Momentum before impact

Remember that momentum is a vector quantity, they took the x+ direction as positive.

Since the ball bounces back, it moves opposite to the initial direction (+), so the final momentum is negative

change in momentum = -a -a = -2a, it becomes like that.
 


Thank you so much. It is clear to me now.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Back
Top