B Uncovering the Preference for Certain Types of Energy

  • B
  • Thread starter Thread starter JLT
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Energy
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the preference of certain energy forms, particularly kinetic energy (KE), potential energy (PE), and thermal energy. It argues that while a rock on a hill may seem to prefer converting PE to KE, this is a misunderstanding of energy states, as energy transformations are driven by entropy rather than any inherent preference. Thermal energy is highlighted as less useful for work, and systems naturally tend to convert KE into heat due to entropy's influence. The conversation emphasizes that there is no actual "wanting" in inanimate systems; rather, energy transformations are governed by statistical mechanics and the tendency toward increased entropy. Ultimately, the preference for certain energy forms is a reflection of thermodynamic principles, not an intrinsic quality of the energy itself.
JLT
Messages
57
Reaction score
8
Between kinetic energy, potential energy, thermal energy - it seems like some forms of energy are preferred over others.
A rock on a hill wants to change its energy from PE → KE
and anything with KE wants to change KE into heat.
Is there are reason that some forms of energy are preferred over others?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I rock on a hill doesn't "want" anything. You are simply thinking of a metastable situation. When the rock falls down the hill, it will eventually end up with gravitational potential energy and no kinetic energy. So there is no preferred form of energy.

The case of thermal energy is different. Not all energy can be turned into useful work, and thermal energy is generally speaking such a case. This is not to say that thermal energy is "preferred," but you have to start taking entropy into account.
 
A rock in air then - given the choice of the energy staying in the form mgh, or the energy changing into 0.5mv^2 the system naturally wants to change mgh into 0.5mv^2 → it likes KE better. If it did not like KE better than it would just remain floating in mid air - it would just keep the original PE.

Systems with KE tend towards heat - the energy likes to change itself into heat.

I think there are definitely some forms of energy that are preferred over other forms - why would some types of energy be preferred over others?
 
JLT said:
Systems with KE tend towards heat - the energy likes to change itself into heat.
How can an inanimate system like or dislike something? Statistical mechanics explains why entropy must increase and hence why kinetic energy is more likely to turn into heat than the other way around; we don't need any notion of "wanting" or "natural tendency" for that.
I think there are definitely some forms of energy that are preferred over other forms - why would some types of energy be preferred over others?
They aren't. In your example of the rock that seems to want to exchange its potential energy for kinetic... Start it with a different initial velocity and will enter an elliptical orbit in which kinetic energy is transformed into potential energy and back again, more or less forever.
 
DrClaude said:
This is not to say that thermal energy is "preferred," but you have to start taking entropy into account.
I think that is really the main answer. If we remove the anthropomorphism, we are left with simply that systems tend toward thermal energy due to entropy. All of the examples are the nuts and bolts of how that happens (friction, impacts, light absorption, etc).
 
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field'
Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
Maxwell’s equations imply the following wave equation for the electric field $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}}{\partial t^2} = \frac{1}{\varepsilon_0}\nabla\rho+\mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf J}{\partial t}.\tag{1}$$ I wonder if eqn.##(1)## can be split into the following transverse part $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}_T-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}_T}{\partial t^2} = \mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf{J}_T}{\partial t}\tag{2}$$ and longitudinal part...
Back
Top