Schools Undergrad research for astronomy grad school

AI Thread Summary
Research experience is important for undergraduates aiming for graduate school in astronomy, but the specific type of research—whether in astronomy or physics—holds less significance than gaining hands-on experience. Physics research is often more accessible due to its prevalence, and this experience is considered valuable for developing a realistic understanding of research processes. The application process for graduate schools in the U.S. focuses on the overall research experience rather than the specific field, making physics research just as relevant as astronomy research. Matching the type of research to future interests may be beneficial, but it is not a critical factor at the application stage.
torquemada
Messages
108
Reaction score
0
hi - does it matter if you do research or not in astronomy as an undergrad? is it ok to just do undergrad physics research for astronomy grad school? does it look any better to do astronomy research versus physics research as an undergrad, or any physics will do? I'm asking as a matter of practicality because physics is the undergrad major for many grad students in astronomy and obviously there are many more opportunities for undergrad research in physics versus astronomy, due to the former being more prevalent than the latter. thank you for your time
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm not from the US and not familiar with the system there. But I think the reason why research experience is seen as something valuable for undergrads is because they have hands-on experience of what research is like, and that they have at least some realistic viewpoint of it. I don't think anyone expects that in undergrad research you gain deep and valuable insights into the field that will benefit the later research group you work in during PhD research and lead it to great achievements.
Based on this I am pretty sure that physics research experience is just as valuable as astronomy research experience. Matching the type of research (lab work, computer analysis, or analytical calculations) may be slightly more important, but if I understand it correctly then in the US you are applying for "grad schools", not for "PhD positions", so at the time of application you don't even know what kind of work you'll be doing later - making this potential point irrelevant.
 
I'm going to make this one quick since I have little time. Background: Throughout my life I have always done good in Math. I almost always received 90%+, and received easily upwards of 95% when I took normal-level HS Math courses. When I took Grade 9 "De-Streamed" Math (All students must take "De-Streamed" in Canada), I initially had 98% until I got very sick and my mark had dropped to 95%. The Physics teachers and Math teachers talked about me as if I were some sort of genius. Then, an...
Bit Britain-specific but I was wondering, what's the best path to take for A-Levels out of the following (I know Y10 seems a bit early to be thinking about A-levels, but my choice will impact what I do this year/ in y11) I (almost) definitely want to do physics at University - so keep that in mind... The subjects that I'm almost definitely going to take are Maths, Further Maths and Physics, and I'm taking a fast track programme which means that I'll be taking AS computer science at the end...
After a year of thought, I decided to adjust my ratio for applying the US/EU(+UK) schools. I mostly focused on the US schools before, but things are getting complex and I found out that Europe is also a good place to study. I found some institutes that have professors with similar interests. But gaining the information is much harder than US schools (like you have to contact professors in advance etc). For your information, I have B.S. in engineering (low GPA: 3.2/4.0) in Asia - one SCI...

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
16
Views
2K
Replies
82
Views
7K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Back
Top