Understand Contravariant Transformations b/w Coordinate Systems

space-time
Messages
218
Reaction score
4
I am trying to make sure that I have a proper understanding of contravariant transformations between coordinate systems.

The contravariant transformation formula is:

Vj = (∂yj/∂xi) * Vi

where Vj is in the y- frame of reference and Vi is in the x-frame of reference. Einstein summation convention is used here.

As an example of applying this formula, I tried to convert a Cartesian vector to a polar coordinates vector to see what the output would be. Here is how that process went:

Vi = <x,y>
x1 = x
x2 = y (These were the coordinate axes in the x-frame)

y1 = r
y2 =θ (These were the axes in the y-frame)

r(x,y) = sqrt(x2 + y2)
θ(x,y)= tan-1(y/x)
(∂r/∂x) = x/sqrt(x2 + y2)
(∂r/∂y) = y/sqrt(x2 + y2)
(∂θ/∂x) = -y/(x2 + y2)
(∂θ/∂x) = x/(x2 + y2)Applying all of this information into the contravariant transformation formula, I get:

V1 (in the y-frame) = [V1(x-frame) * (∂y1/∂x1)] + [V2(x-frame) * (∂y1/∂x2)] =[ x * (∂r/∂x) ] + [y * (∂r/∂y)]

= (x2 + y2) / sqrt(x2 + y2) = r2/r = r

V2 (in the y-frame) = [V1(x-frame) * (∂y2/∂x1)] + [V2(x-frame) * (∂y2/∂x2)] =[ x * (∂θ/∂x) ] + [y * (∂θ/∂y)]

= -xy/r2 + xy/r2 = 0

In short, my contravariant transformation from Cartesian to polar coordinates turned the vector <x,y> to <r,0>.

Is this the correct result. Am I appropriately and correctly applying the contravariant transformation formula or do you use this transformation in some different way?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, you have just taken the position vector and it should be a familiar result that this vector is ##r \vec e_r## in polar coordinates in the plane.

A suggestion regarding notation, the more standard notation would be to use a prime to denote the components in one of the systems. It is also easier to keep track of things if you use the variable names instead of numbers to label the different components, i.e., ##V^r##, ##V^\theta##, etc.
 
  • Like
Likes bcrowell
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Does the speed of light change in a gravitational field depending on whether the direction of travel is parallel to the field, or perpendicular to the field? And is it the same in both directions at each orientation? This question could be answered experimentally to some degree of accuracy. Experiment design: Place two identical clocks A and B on the circumference of a wheel at opposite ends of the diameter of length L. The wheel is positioned upright, i.e., perpendicular to the ground...
According to the General Theory of Relativity, time does not pass on a black hole, which means that processes they don't work either. As the object becomes heavier, the speed of matter falling on it for an observer on Earth will first increase, and then slow down, due to the effect of time dilation. And then it will stop altogether. As a result, we will not get a black hole, since the critical mass will not be reached. Although the object will continue to attract matter, it will not be a...
Back
Top