Understand Phosphorous Oxyacid: Get Answers Here

  • Thread starter Thread starter TT0
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on understanding phosphorous oxyacid, specifically its bonding and acid properties. Participants clarify that the silver precipitate in question is metallic silver, indicating a reduction process rather than silver hydroxide. There is a request for clarification on how bonding affects the acid's ability to donate protons (H+). Additionally, there is a suggestion to refer to textbooks for detailed information on the types of bonds present in phosphoric acids. Overall, the conversation seeks to deepen the understanding of the chemical behavior of phosphorous oxyacids.
TT0
Messages
210
Reaction score
3

Homework Statement


Screen Shot 2016-07-02 at 12.10.40 PM.png

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


The silver precipitate is silver hydroxide. The acid is a diprotic acid. However, I don't really know how does the bonding effect it's ability to donate H+. Also what are the arrows in molecules 2, 3, 4? Can someone explain this to me.

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
TT0 said:
The silver precipitate is silver hydroxide.

No, it is metallic silver, so the silver was reduced.

Please check what your book says about phosphoric acids, it definitely must mention what kinds of bonds are present.
 
  • Like
Likes CrazyNinja
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top