Understand Power Loss in a Wire Through V, I and R

  • Thread starter Thread starter kuwerty
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Confused
AI Thread Summary
Power loss in electrical wires is primarily calculated using the formula I²R, where I is current and R is resistance. To minimize power loss, reducing current is recommended, but this necessitates increasing voltage proportionally. The key point is that power loss is based on the voltage drop across the wire, not the total voltage transmitted. Delivering electricity at higher voltages allows for lower current, which reduces the size and cost of wiring and minimizes losses due to resistance. Ultimately, higher voltage transmission is more efficient, as it mitigates the effects of resistance and friction in the wire.
kuwerty
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I would be grateful if anyone could clear up my confusion with this relatively simple concept. It has been bugging me for 3 years now and I've never had a clear answer from my teachers.

Consider a power line transmitting electricity:
Power loss in the wire = I2R = VI
To reduce power loss I am told you are to reduce the current...

However when you reduce the current (say 10x) you must increase the voltage 10x.


I = V/R therefore Power can also be written as V2/R
If you are increasing the voltage Power loss is anything but decreased?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
kuwerty said:
I would be grateful if anyone could clear up my confusion with this relatively simple concept. It has been bugging me for 3 years now and I've never had a clear answer from my teachers.

Consider a power line transmitting electricity:
Power loss in the wire = I2R = VI
To reduce power loss I am told you are to reduce the current...

However when you reduce the current (say 10x) you must increase the voltage 10x.


I = V/R therefore Power can also be written as V2/R
If you are increasing the voltage Power loss is anything but decreased?

The power lost in the line is VI where the V is the voltage DROP across the wire, not the total AC voltage that is being transmitted down the line. The voltage that you get at the end is Vin - Vdrop, so the losses are Vdrop * I, or just I^2 * R.
 
kuwerty said:
To reduce power loss I am told you are to reduce the current...
Basically, the concept you're missing is that the same power can be delivered at higher voltages, at lower amperes.

Electricity is delivered through wires at a higher voltage than necessary for a couple of reasons:
- Since the power remains the same, more volts means less amps. High amps requires larger wires than low amps. Smaller wire costs less and weighs less, so supports don't have to be so bulky which, in turn, saves on material thus saving even more money.

- Without going into great detail, low amperage transmits more "easily" than high amperage. Think of a small water pipe. It can deliver water efficiently up to a certain point. Once the flow (compare to amps in a wire) reaches a high enough level, friction loss begins to make a more noticeable effect (think voltage drop). This "friction" accounts for some loss in power, therefore running electricity at a higher voltage reduces that effect.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top