Understanding a special combination

  • Thread starter Thread starter anigeo
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Combination
anigeo
Messages
83
Reaction score
0
nC0+nC1+nC2+.....+nCn=2^n

in the analytic proof for this my books say that it is the total number of combinations of n different things taken at least 1 at a time.
they say that each object can be dealt in 2 ways, either it can be accepted or it can be rejected.
hence n objects can be dealt in 2^n ways.
but how in selection how does the question of rejection come?what is the significance of this rejection?please explain.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I can't understand your question. However a simple proof of the equation is by means of the binomial theorem. Expand (a+b)n and then let a=b=1 and you will get the result.
 
mathman said:
I can't understand your question. However a simple proof of the equation is by means of the binomial theorem. Expand (a+b)n and then let a=b=1 and you will get the result.

the binomial proof is done.this is the analytic proof in which they say that every object of n objects can be dealt in 2 ways,s objects can be dealt with in 2^2 ways,3 in 2^3 ways.this includes an acceptance of the object or its rejection.acceptance or selection is all right.how does the question of rejection arise?
 
It looks to be a matter of wording. Since every object can be dealt with in either of two ways, the two ways may be labeled "acceptance" or "rejection".
 
that's the thing, u got it.but how can u say that it can be dealt in only 2 ways?
 
anigeo said:
that's the thing, u got it.but how can u say that it can be dealt in only 2 ways?
That's what it is to prove the particular equation. If it's more than two ways, you have a different expression.
 
Namaste & G'day Postulate: A strongly-knit team wins on average over a less knit one Fundamentals: - Two teams face off with 4 players each - A polo team consists of players that each have assigned to them a measure of their ability (called a "Handicap" - 10 is highest, -2 lowest) I attempted to measure close-knitness of a team in terms of standard deviation (SD) of handicaps of the players. Failure: It turns out that, more often than, a team with a higher SD wins. In my language, that...
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Back
Top