Understanding Acceleration: A Simple Test Question

  • Thread starter Thread starter Lord Patrick
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Acceleration
AI Thread Summary
A ball moving at a constant speed inside a hollow sphere is indeed accelerating due to its circular motion, despite maintaining a constant speed. Acceleration is defined as a change in velocity, which includes changes in direction, not just speed. The centripetal force acting on the ball is responsible for this acceleration, directing it toward the center of the circle. The discussion also highlights the distinction between speed (a scalar) and velocity (a vector), emphasizing that velocity involves both speed and direction. Understanding these concepts clarifies why the ball is considered to be accelerating even when its speed remains constant.
Lord Patrick
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I have a very simple test question about acceleration. A ball is moving at a constant speed inside of a hollow sphere. The question is whether or not the ball is accelerating. I said that it was not accelerating because the ball is always moving forward, even though it is traveling in a circular path. My teacher said that it was accelerating but the only explanation that I was given was that the ball is moving in a circle. This is a very simple question, but it is bothering the heck out of me.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What is the definition of acceleration?

What is the difference between speed and velocity?
 
Lord Patrick said:
I have a very simple test question about acceleration. A ball is moving at a constant speed inside of a hollow sphere. The question is whether or not the ball is accelerating. I said that it was not accelerating because the ball is always moving forward, even though it is traveling in a circular path. My teacher said that it was accelerating but the only explanation that I was given was that the ball is moving in a circle. This is a very simple question, but it is bothering the heck out of me.
If a ball with a mass m makes a circular motion, the direction of the velocity is constantly changing. In order to change the velocity of an object, a force is needed, and F=ma. If there were no acceleration, the ball wouldn't go in a circle, but simply in a straight line.

The acceleration we're talking about when some object goes in a circle is the centripetal acceleration. So you could say that the ball is accelerated to the center by the centripetal force.
 
Are you taking about a moving ball inside a stationary hollow sphere (in an inertial coordinate system)? Are you talking about a ball with a constant speed (a scalar) and not a constant velocity (a vector)? Is the ball rolling without slipping on the inside surface of the hollow sphere? Is the ball rolling without slipping on the inside surface of the sphere under the influence of gravity? Is the ball solid, with uniform density? Are you talking about the ball rolling in a horizontal plane only (no vertical motion)?
 
Welcome to PF!

Hi Lord Patrick! Welcome to PF! :smile:
Lord Patrick said:
… I said that it was not accelerating because the ball is always moving forward, even though it is traveling in a circular path.

Anything whose velocity is changing is accelerating …

so is its velocity changing? :wink:
 
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top